Missing the Obvious
Lone Ranger and Tonto
The Lone Ranger and Tonto are
camping in the desert, set up their tent, and are asleep. Some hours
later, The Lone Ranger wakes his faithful friend.
"Tonto, look up and tell me what you see."
Tonto replies, "Me see millions of stars."
"What does that tell you?" asks The Lone Ranger.
Tonto ponders for a minute.
"Astronomically speaking, it tells me that there are millions of
galaxies and potentially billions of planets.
Astrologically, it tells me that Saturn is in Leo.
Time wise, it appears to be approximately a quarter past three.
Theologically, it's evident the Lord is all powerful and we are small and
insignificant.
Meteorologically, it seems we will have a beautiful day tomorrow.
What it tell you, Kemo Sabi?"
The Lone Ranger is silent for a moment, then speaks.
"Tonto, you Dumb Hoss, someone has stolen our tent."
The above joke is a good lesson in missing the obvious. Chances are that you were surprised by the Lone Ranger's response. However, the first sentence of the joke tells you that the Lone Ranger and Tonto were camping in a tent. It should have been clear at Tonto's first response that he was missing the obvious.
Likewise, those who have already decided that God does not exist and that all processes must have a naturalistic explanation, do not see the obvious evidence that the universe was designed, rather than happened by chance. As discussed on another page, rational explanations for the creation of the universe come down to two main possibilities:
- Design by an intelligent being
- Happened by random chance
What are the differences between the two creators?
| Characteristic | God | Super Universe |
| Transcendence | Yes | Yes |
| Eternal | Yes | Yes |
| Creation of Universe | Designed | Random |
| Intelligence | High | Stupid |
What we see in the table is a comparison of the two possible types of creators. Both creators must possess certain characteristics in common, such as being eternal and being transcendent to this universe. However, the naturalistic creator must be "stupid" and must have created our exquisitely-designed universe through some sort of random process. For some reason, the atheist chooses to believe that the universe arose randomly by the action of a stupid creator, instead of seeing the obvious - that a well-designed universe would most likely come into being through the actions of an intelligent designer. Let me give you an example. I show you a computer and ask you to make your best choice as to how it came into being:
- Designed and put together by intelligent human beings.
- Random computer parts were put into a large box and the parts soldered randomly by spraying molten lead into the box as it was rotated. This process was continued many times until the computer happened to be produced.
Well, its your choice. Have you checked your tent lately?
Today's New Reason To Believe
[Active Archive Link, Click Above]
- 10/10/2008 12:05 AM
Pearls of Wisdom
David H. Rogstad, Ph.D. In my study of Scripture I occasionally come across a passage that captures my attention because it encapsulates a particular idea in a complete way. Examples that immediately come to mind are Psalms 1 where we find clear steps describing how to have success in all we do, ... - 10/09/2008 12:05 AM
Disposing the Cell’s Trash, Part 1 (of 2)
Posted by Fazale ‘Fuz’ Rana, Ph.D. New Insight into the Cell’s Quality-Control Systems Provided Added Evidence for Design Have you ever had trash that the garbage man wouldn’t take? We sure have. I remember a few years ago we re-carpeted the upstairs of our home. Instead ... - 10/08/2008 12:05 AM
Chronology of Early Solar System Events
by Jeff Zweerink I enjoy traveling, whether taking a trip to visit relatives for Christmas or a summertime vacation to witness the beauty of creation. However, any trip with my family (wife and five kids) requires lots of preparation in order to achieve success. Clothes must be packed, bills ... - 10/07/2008 12:05 AM
The Golden Rule of Apologetics, Part 4 (of 7)
Kenneth Richard Samples Attack the argument, not the person! By necessity, any apologetics venture, including that of Christianity, entails critiquing other people’s arguments, positions, and overarching worldviews. Defending the faith often involves clash because two viewpoints that ... - 10/06/2008 12:05 AM
Too Much Sulfur
by Hugh Ross Recent studies conducted on Venus and Mars illustrate just how carefully fine-tuned a planet’s abundance of sulfur must be for life to be possible. Sulfur plays a crucial role in life chemistry. This fact became personal for me a year ago when I was diagnosed as sulfur ... - 10/03/2008 12:05 AM
Holy Fish Armor, Batman!
By Katie Galloway [Katie Galloway is an RTB volunteer apologist. She is completing her PhD at Caltech in Chemical Engineering with an emphasis in biological systems.] Ancient Armored Fish May Hold Clues to Lighter, Stronger Bioinspired Armor If you’ve seen The Dark Knight, you know that ... - 10/02/2008 12:05 AM
Restricted by Design
Fazale ‘Fuz’ Rana, Ph.D. Rational Design of Novel Enzyme Highlights Biochemical Design In 1978, three scientists (Hamilton Smith, Werner Arber, and Daniel Nathans) were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the discovery of restriction enzymes and their applications. ...
Last Modified March 10, 2005



