Evidence for God from Science

I can't resist the post. My terrible sense of humor getting the bets of me. Though it is only partially 'Tongue in cheek'.

So, RickD? Are we going to ask you to prove your links as well?

*Continues to giggle on their side of the screen* Sorry mate, couldn't resist.

*Salutes Neo-x*

Good luck and god speed.

.....Posted stuff.... Um....just a point, but don't you have to show how/where/why the links Neo-X posted are twaddle? As opposed to you simply just saying that they are twaddle...? Such as "I've read this link and it's plainly wrong at this point..." etc? For example. I can't find any us...

"Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation"

?

Really....

And this is supposed to work...how...?

RickD wrote:....... realize that all of it isn't proven.......

Um...would perhaps you wish to step over to the 'Complexity' thread? Or the "Double think' thread?

I'm interested to see these 'Unproven'/'Dis-proven' aspects of which you speak.

:Thumbs up: Neo-x

Much cheers to all.

*Cough* Neo's calling it 'Facts' because they are pretty much posting nothing but...*Cough*

One simple answer I have seen is 'Code copying errors'. When genes are copied the general theme/want is for an exact new copy to be formed. However, sometimes the mechanism 'glitches' and one of two things happen. The little bit of protein is possibly deleted or a duplicate one added. Then I think t...

Nope, still pretty sure I'm in the right frame of mind/questioning etc.

*Takes off hard hat and looks @ Furstentum Liechtenstein*

You should watch where you're swinging that thing.

* Picks up oar * No...pretty sure I'm still asking valid things based on the opening post. To paraphrase. "One can't keep a literal Bible idea in their heads AND literal Evolution. That's doing Double Think" So...replace 'Evolution' with 'Geology' or 'Astronomy' and the same meanings apply...

*Throws oar into the pond as they are tired and should know better*

So...all those Geologists? They are doing what, exactly? In regards to the age of the Earth?

Or how about the Astronomers? What are they doing exactly when they use their telescopes etc?

Much cheers to all.

Seeker wrote:do you feel you are persuaded to view him as a nice guy because he shares the same view on religion that you do. Or is it an honest observation?

From what I've seen of his performances and what I've seen of random interviews. To me he seems like a nice enough guy.

*Shrug*

Seeker wrote:what are your guys views on the somewhat now outspoken Atheist Penn Jillette?

Seems like a not too bad guy.

*Shrug*

And here I was hoping there was a "Ba-boom, Tish!" smiley/emote to go along with Danieltwotwenty's last post. ;) Ah well.... Very much cheers to all. Haha yea it was very tongue in cheek because we all know that moths didn't evolve from orchids sheesh! They just have a common ancestor. y:...

And here I was hoping there was a "Ba-boom, Tish!" smiley/emote to go along with Danieltwotwenty's last post.

Ah well....

Very much cheers to all.

The point Fuz was making, was that this discovery goes against the most current evolutionary beliefs on the subject. Like I said, you missed the point. Very much no cheers for you. ;) Um...really? Okay...that would maybe explain the 15 to 20 minutes doing pretty much nothing but waffling on about f...