Evidence for God from Science

God is a God of order, and it pleased Him to do the things He did in the order He did them in. You cannot and we must not restrict God to our natural view of Spiritual creation. Day age is also a sense of order. It even has more order. The Big Bang was the biggest explosion there ever was, yet inst...

Yes, it has always been seen as a 24hr day by mainstream christians throuout history. Until recently when evilutuion poked it's head in the door opened by old age theory. I find Gods Word has always been markedly accurate, even before any revelation I get, when I do get it I am blown away. Wrong ag...

Gen 2:19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. Gen 2:20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl...

Hmmm, I think Darwin was reincarnated. :lol: Believing in evolution and believing in an older earth are two seperate things. I have researched Yom. The context where one finds it in relation to the Word leaves no doubt in a Rabbis mind that it refers to a literal day. That is one morning and one ev...

Anyone know the half life of carbon? Roughly 5700 years. Also try this: Young Earth creationism was abandoned as a mainstream scientific concept over 150 years ago. While many mainstream scientists respect it as a faith position, they contend that it is little more than that and regard attempts to ...

Science is based on ideas, presumptions, beliefs and then goes on to test these through experiments. In other words, as I heard one prof say, "Science is based on the Faith of the scientist." Before the hypothesis comes the idea and belief and presumptions and then comes the experiments a...

It's obvious you believe so-called sciences over and above the Word of God. So I assume that if you were offered poison to drink, you would not hesitate to take considering that the Bible says you would be ok? The Bible encourages us to test what we think is true so that we may know for ourselves. ...

Coming from the scientific view point, one cannot prove the existance of a desinger. However, direct proof is not necessary to believe something. We do know that the universe is endlessly complicated and only two conclusions have been derived: it was done on purpose or by accident. Experience tells ...

Jesus obviously was not created. Otherwise He would not be God. John 17:5 also shows that He always existed and that the creation of His physical body shouldn't be confused with Him always being.

So why are 'unkowns' put forth in the classroom as 'fact' as if it is known? I think it's high time people stop deluding themselves, wake up and start caring wether or not that we live and love lies. I for one cannot tolerate lies, of any magnitude! Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and ab...

It's not an assumption when taken literally. So you are going to pick and choose now what parts to take literally now in the Bible? Do you believe eating Jesus is canabalism? lol. As a matter of fact He did tell us, indirectly by counting backwards through the geneology. BTW the "Date" wo...

The truth? :shock: Oh! noes! we can't have truth interfere with the naturalist agenda! :lol: Science holds a very high standard. Few things (if anything) can be proven to exist. Our own senses may be lying to us. We may not even exist at all and are just a figment of someone's imagination (that wou...

That's exactly my point Cobra!! I believe in God. I reject ID (which is proposed as a scientific theory) If by Intelligent Design you mean the movement to get it in the classroom, then I agree. But God had to be intelligent to design (the most intelligent at that). Therefore, even though we can't s...

mathmystic wrote:B.W.
For myself, I do believe in God, but as you can see I reject ID.


Now let's stop right there.

Ok, just reread it. You DO believe in God, but not intelligent design? That seems contradictory right there. So is God mentally retarded then or what?

B.W. If it transcends the natural world then it cannot be defined, predicted, measured and tested within the natural world. If any of those things were true then it could no longer be said to transcend the natural world - obviously. Therefore the Intelligent Designer could not be supernatural. It c...