Evidence for God from Science

There is a general point to be made here, which is that whenever a 'spontaneous creationist' spots a disagreement among evolutionists, that alone is assumed to be good evidence that evolution is a complete nonsense and thus creationism must be correct. They rarely look at themselves from a similar ...

Audacity said Obviously you're not familiar with how science operates. Scientists disagreeing with the status quo is how science often progresses. Einstein could never have come up with his theories of relativity if he hadn't disagreed with Newton. Have you been banned. Not sure. Still... I am famil...

I agree that evolutionary scientists that disagree with an evolutionary theory or mechanism still believe in molecules to man. There really aren't many choices. Either life as we see it arose somehow by a natural mechanism or by the hand of a higher power. Who might these " evolutionary scient...

hughfarey wrote That's not really the same as saying that energy can turn into matter as organised as a cell, or even a protein, or even an atom (!) instantly, but I take your point. The building blocks of matter, called atoms, lie at the base of life's organizational structure. My expectation is th...

That's all in your head my man :ewink: I merely pointed out an interesting video which suggests that random mutation/natural selection is not sufficient to account for all that we see in the past and present, along with a few other problems for neo-Darwinism. Not a video, an audiofile, but yes, ind...

The Royal Society called for a meeting to revise the standard theory of evolution because of the many issues with such theory. Our two guests who are experts in the field went there and are here to talk about the top 5 problems with Macro-Evolutionary Neo-Darwinian theory. Find out what they are! “...

crochet1949 wrote:Interesting comments.

Thanks.

The first link in my last post is a downloadable copy of Dawkins book, "The God Delusion".

Evolution, if true, is an ENTIRELY dependent serious of processes on what came into physical existence that did not previously exist. The universe roared into existence with immense power and immediately obeying key laws. So, this HAS to mean that 1) Something pre-existed all physical matter that w...

crochet wrote: If there's one thing I'm NOT it's a car mechanic -- but I've driven a variety of cars since I was 16. I know enough About cars to know they didn't evolve. Crochet, I hate to be the one to break the bad news to you, but the automobile has evolved. http://blog.world-mysteries.com/scien...

Let's just go for the top ten :ebiggrin: Here is one of Dawkins works "The God Delusion". ".....Creative intelligences, being evolved, necessarily arrive late in the universe, and therefore cannot be responsible for designing it. God,in the sense defined, is a delusion; and, as later...

crochet wrote: If there's one thing I'm NOT it's a car mechanic -- but I've driven a variety of cars since I was 16. I know enough About cars to know they didn't evolve. Crochet, I hate to be the one to break the bad news to you, but the automobile has evolved. http://blog.world-mysteries.com/scien...

Mazzy, Why are abiogenesis, and a creator mutually exclusive? I am not sure I understand your question. In answer, I'd say because all the evidence available to date strongly suggests chemical reactions cannot produce a living organism there must be a designer/creator. Hence theistic naturalists do...

Mazzy, Why are abiogenesis, and a creator mutually exclusive? I am not sure I understand your question. In answer, I'd say because all the evidence available to date strongly suggests chemical reactions cannot produce a living organism there must be a designer/creator. Hence theistic naturalists do...

Mazzy, Why are abiogenesis, and a creator mutually exclusive? I am not sure I understand your question. In answer, I'd say because all the evidence available to date strongly suggests chemical reactions cannot produce a living organism there must be a designer/creator. Hence theistic naturalists do...

In response to the subject matter... At least creationists have physics on their side. For me it is a lesser leap of faith to believe a higher intelligence was able to use a proven theory to create, energy can form matter in an instant, than to believe that non living matter could become organised i...