Evidence for God from Science

If we can wade through the insults and rhetorical chaff, I don't think Audie ended up disagreeing with the following claims that I actually made... It's much easier to prove that a theory (like YEC, Gap, and Darwinistic Evolution) contradicts Scripture and/or Science than it is to find a theory tha...

If we can wade through the insults and rhetorical chaff, I don't think Audie ended up disagreeing with the following claims that I actually made... It's much easier to prove that a theory (like YEC, Gap, and Darwinistic Evolution) contradicts Scripture and/or Science than it is to find a theory tha...

Audie wrote: So RD you claim I made an error. You've not shown I made any other than to be here. How have I shown, implied, or suggested that you made an error by being here? Seriously Audie, It seems like you want to argue for the sake of arguing. The error you made, was interpreting what DBowling...

Stu: Typical responses from an atheist/evolutionist. Would rather fling mud than have a decent discussion when put in a corner or faced with a tough debate. Philip: That is because a non-theist MUST have some mechanism that refutes the necessity for God as a cause of all things. Audie: And Phil...?...

audie wrote: DB said ToE is easily disproved, and cited work from a, yes, crackpot that does not even pretend to, still less succeed in, disproving ToE. No he didn't. I suggest you go back and reread what he actually said! Your entire insulting post is based on YOUR ERROR! You misread, or misunders...

Audie, I don't get it. When you were here before, you complained about trying to have a rational discussion about evolution. Now that DBowling wants to have a discussion about specific things regarding evolution, you just attack Behe and Meyer, without actually responding to the points that DBowlin...

Typical responses from an atheist/evolutionist. Would rather fling mud than have a decent discussion when put in a corner or faced with a tough debate. You are missing entirely what I said, and that DB and I essentially agreed; that certain aspects of so-called "Darwian evolution" are lon...

Why yes, I commented several times that whatever (redundant) demonstration that Victorian science is out of date is, well, redundant. If you ever said what point there is in bringing it up, I missed it. Likewise where they did the heavy lifting, or anything at all toward disproving ToE, which you in...

Audie, I don't get it. When you were here before, you complained about trying to have a rational discussion about evolution. Now that DBowling wants to have a discussion about specific things regarding evolution, you just attack Behe and Meyer, without actually responding to the points that DBowlin...

To the extent that behe has come back to savage a long dead horse, he is not of much interest. Is there a point in highlighting such an accomplishment? I dont see it. Do you? To the extent that he is an "ID" advocate, he is being a crackpot. I introducd th word quaint. Gt your own. Prolm w...

Well, yes I do have to fault myself for being critical, rather than appreciating the quaint and rather Victorian charm of someone thinking that it is news that someone had managed to discredit something from 19th century science. That, btw, Behe or some other has done good work in one area does not ...

Citing pop pseudoscience from a crackpot ( Behe) just makes it more distasteful. And your baseless statements about Behe reveal more about your knowledge and credibility than it does about Behe's professional credentials. Have you even read Behe's books? Or are you just repeating ignorant nonsense ...

Many do not know what they're talking about when it comes to Meyer and Behe. They believe the evidence strongly supports common descent, and don't disregard evolution per se , which is something many mistakenly think about them. I'm not sure Behe and Meyer share precisely the same perspective on co...

Citing pop pseudoscience from a crackpot ( Behe) just makes it more distasteful. And your baseless statements about Behe reveal more about your knowledge and credibility than it does about Behe's professional credentials. Have you even read Behe's books? Or are you just repeating ignorant nonsense ...

Oh, one other thing-

A properly written scientific paper of the sort
always cites issues, it is misleading to say
Darwin relectantly confessed that in the day,
the fossil record was all but totally unexplored.