Evidence for God from Science

CliffsofBurton wrote: Now I'm having fun.

If you want fun, go to your local playground. You want a lollipop to go?

CliffsofBurton wrote:Therefore, the Bible is a hypothesis. That would make you a HypoTheist.

Now I'm having fun.

The bible is not a science textbook. And yes, "creation" is one hypothesis, not the bible itself.

So was the black hole, until recently. But before they were actually seen doing what they do, (devouring suns, and releasing massive amounts of energy{gamma bursts, or blazars}) they existed only in THEORY. Theories are verified hypothesis making a theory fact based. We say "hypothetically&quo...

cfldsl. Scientists cannot prove these things. They can only THEORIZE. A theory is a well though out, educated guess. Theories are indeed best guesses. But for it to be a best guess it requires testing. In this phase its status is of type hypothesis. After its been tested against competing hypothesi...

If I were to make an even bigger assumption based on my previous outlook, then I'd say we are dealing with a God that laughs at time.

You asked if the evolution of automobile was reversed and would it produce the same output if it was rerun again. I answered indirectly, eventually the same output would be expressed given enough time, it may vary randomly with respect to time but it would eventually kick in. When I say "would&...

Bgood said: If we were to replay it up to the present time, do you feel that the models and brands we have today will be the exact same? Or would you reason that certain enhancements, features and embellishments will arise at different times from the timeline we live in. For example if we were to p...

Can a Darwinist be a Christian?

For Ken Miller, that is possible so I don't see it to be impossible the other way around, despite the illogicalities associated with it.

Ultimately, changes occur at the molecular level , this is what intelligent design is interested in and explicitly targets this scope. Fossils and other hyper abstract puzzle fitting as constituting evidence for all diversity of life don't hold water. If you're going to make a case, make the case at...

The fact remains, regardless of the origin of life, the theory of evolution still explains the diversity of life. The other fact remains, regardless of the origin of life, MET (as in the extended Darwinian fairytale) is only one explanation for the diversity of life, one explanation for how it coul...

Barabus wrote:
......and yes, we have met before. Barabus isn't my only name.

Barabus had evolved from a previous user?

Let me guess, you started out as a Barbarian...

Barbourula kalimantanensis is a frog located in Singapore that has evolved to a lungless species which now breathes through it's skin, due to drastic alterations of it's habitat caused by the progressive development of humans in that region. Evolved into a lungless species? That sounds a whole lot ...

Shuglins seems to have the exact same arguments as Dawkins, maybe its him. Ofcourse, all hardcore "youtube" Atheists (with a captial 'A') follow the Dawkins Bible, you can't expect any less from a full-fledged religion.

You want a "rebuttal" of Darwinian evolution, you're gonna have to do a little better then that. Here is your rebuttal... Link One Link Two Link Three Want more? Don't forget Behes "Darwins Blackbox" and "The edge of evolution", Mike Genes "The Design Matrix" ...

Theories are verified hypothesis, verified in the sense of being equal to a law, this is why there is a law of gravity and a theory, because its beyond verified. Evolution is in no way a law, laws are universal, if there was a law of evolution by chance and necessity that law would not allow intelli...