Evidence for God from Science

>>Correct me if I am wrong, but I am unaware of any mathematical formula that was created before some event(s) observation<< I think many entities in physics, especially in quantum mechanics, quantum chromodynamics, quantum electrodynamics, and particle physics were first speculated to exist because...

:( >>please tell me about anything else which is not clear<< I'm afraid none of this is clear. It is word salad. Let me just give one example - and correct me if I'm wrong. The word karyotype means a photograph of the chromosomes during a specific phase of mitosis (or meiosis) when they show up most...

On October 18, 2004, the school board voted 6—3 to add the following statement to their biology curriculum: Students will be made aware of the gaps/problems in Darwin's theory and of other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent design. Note: Origins of life is not taught. O...

>>Pick up his book "Origin of Species" and count how many times he used the word "creator" there<< I thought he didn't use it at all in the original edition. Then in following editions, he softened things a little here and there, inserting the word "Creator" in the last...

>>ATP synthase structures haven't been duplicated yet in a lab under natural conditions<< That's not surprising. Test tube synthesis is used for a few proteins, but these are huge and cumbersome molecules. Most are synthesized with the eager help of genetically modified bacteria. Most test tube synt...

>>ATP synthase structures haven't been duplicated yet in a lab under natural conditions.. Good luck with that one<<I>>to teach evolutionary theory...automatically entangles one in philosophical and theological issues<< You can find theological issues in a can of Campbell's soup if that's what you wa...

Was there a question in there somewhere?

What is the problem with teaching ID? When all the rhetoric dies down, ID hangs its hat on irreducible complexity. The minute an ID advocate identifies a structure or process that is supposed to be irreducibly complex, scientists immediately show that it is not. For example, the flagellum does NOT h...

Those who follow the evidence will abandon the current brand of intelligent design. That does not have to mean they abandon God. There are many negative innuendoes in your post, I hardly know where to start.

Just to chime in - very interesting discussion here. BTW, Bart, this is syn-mo from the DDI thread. I read all the previous posts, and understand the rationale of suspecting socio-eco-Gaia-political agendae surrounding that article. I suspect the definitive nature of the conclusion was solidified mo...

>>Polyploidy could never have produced karyotypes as we know them,for two reasons at least.Firstly,polyploidy never produces novel chromosomes. Secondly,simple arithmetic tells us that polyploidy could never have produced karyotypes as we know them.And besides,polyploidy is only relevant to plants<<...

To Silver tusk: >>What do people think of this story and how it fits in with our world view...<< Trying to fit a scientific finding into any particular worldview is something that every conscientious scientist tries NOT to do. They all have biases, and they're not going to perform perfectly, but the...

>>What's wrong with Uranus?<<

Ask any 7th grade science teacher

"How can we expect to agree on a definition that will be not only understood by ourselves, but other forms of life if and when we encounter them?" I think I would be willing to tke my chances on that problem. I vote that we get rid of what was called Pluto, as a planet. That would leave us...

Science is littered with ideas that were simply waiting for someone to credit. The idea of descent from common ancestors had been milling around for a long time - maybe for many centuries. Oftimes the credit goes to the guy who finally puts it all together. Blythe omitted the key parts that would so...