Search found 290 matches

by David Blacklock
Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:27 pm
Forum: General Discussion & Introductions
Topic: New archeological find
Replies: 5
Views: 1775

Re: New archeological find

Hi FL,

For sure artistic license. I just tho't it was interesting that an artist of that time period would want to put the three of them together.

DB
by David Blacklock
Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:49 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
Replies: 157
Views: 35427

Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution

Hi Zoegirl, As I think you have pointed out, in a single generation - or three generations, assuming most of us will get to see an average of three generations in our lifetimes - not enough time passes for changes to be obvious. Therefore, you have to look into the past. I'm sure you're aware of the...
by David Blacklock
Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:47 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: ID...why isn't it religion?
Replies: 113
Views: 31791

Re: ID...why isn't it religion?

Hi Kurieuo, I googled it - haven't found yet what you are speaking of but will look again. I did find evidence that he responded to claims that he was a liberal activist by his rebuttal: If you look at public polls in the United States, at any given time a significant percentage of Americans believe...
by David Blacklock
Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:06 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: ID...why isn't it religion?
Replies: 113
Views: 31791

Re: ID...why isn't it religion?

>>judges probably know very little about science<<

Everybody in that courtroom got an impressive primer on science, including the judge - enough to convince him ID was basically a religious proposition and that it wasn't science.

DB
by David Blacklock
Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:03 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
Replies: 157
Views: 35427

Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution

You're a hard man to impress, Gman! :eugeek:

DB
by David Blacklock
Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:10 pm
Forum: God and Science
Topic: ID...why isn't it religion?
Replies: 113
Views: 31791

Re: ID...why isn't it religion?

Hi Gman, If you'll look closely, you'll see that I never said Judge Jones was a scientist. And Stephen J. Gould was a staunch defender of evolution, including what you are calling macroevolution....and...evolution has stood up to vigorous scientific testing for 150 years - sometimes being refined, b...
by David Blacklock
Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:02 pm
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
Replies: 157
Views: 35427

Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution

Hi Mr. McGrew, About blind cave fish - interesting that they not only lose their eyesight due to lack of selection pressure but their pigmentation. No need to have a color that benefits survival or mate-attraction skills if there is not enough light to be seen. Yet the brain space is filled in by so...
by David Blacklock
Tue Aug 26, 2008 4:31 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: ID...why isn't it religion?
Replies: 113
Views: 31791

Re: ID...why isn't it religion?

Hi Gman, >>What is your evidence for macroevolution?<< Transitional fossils? Opposable thumbs? DNA relics of genes leaving a family tree? >>Why ID isn't scientific?<< After several weeks of listening to expert testimony under oath, a judge said it wasn't science - Judge Jones, Dover trial. DB
by David Blacklock
Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:51 pm
Forum: God and Science
Topic: ID...why isn't it religion?
Replies: 113
Views: 31791

Re: ID...why isn't it religion?

Hi Gerald and welcome. I agree with everything you said. Good post! :clap:

DB
by David Blacklock
Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:31 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: ID...why isn't it religion?
Replies: 113
Views: 31791

Re: ID...why isn't it religion?

Hi Hman, Very good post. I have been listening to an audio about fossilized relics in DNA. There are undoubtedly thousands of them, where a useful gene slowly falls into phenotypic disuse while being "selected out." The gene eventually gathers mutations which don't affect the phenotype but...
by David Blacklock
Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:53 pm
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Following Evolution in Individual Genes
Replies: 0
Views: 1275

Following Evolution in Individual Genes

The fascinating abstract below is a good example of the depth of knowledge one needs in order to follow the more complicated parts of genes and evolution - and this is an extremely simplified summary of the whole presentation: Surprising Details Of Evolution Of Protein Translation Revealed ScienceDa...
by David Blacklock
Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:49 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
Replies: 157
Views: 35427

Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution

Embryological development is a cascade of changes that occur in harmony with each other, directed by the conductor (the genetic code). Occasionally, however, a trumpet player sneezes, a drummer drops his pounder, a violinist breaks a string, or a trombonist has a stroke. Depending on how badly that ...
by David Blacklock
Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:49 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
Replies: 157
Views: 35427

Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution

I think "admit" is not the appropriate word. There was no crime committed. Errors in development occur frequently - errors that are not coded in the genes. Some of the more common congenital heart abnormalities fall into this category - septal defects, tetralogy, etc.

DB
by David Blacklock
Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:47 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
Replies: 157
Views: 35427

Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution

>>Will we see more and more cats with two faces?<<

What a bunch of copycats! Here, Kitty, Kitty... :oops:

DB

More seriously, there probably was no mutation here - just an error in embryological development.

DB