Search found 240 matches
- Mon Aug 04, 2008 9:45 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
- Replies: 157
- Views: 35422
Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
David: What do you mean? These quotes are taken verbatim from prior posts... I am simply restating them.
- Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:43 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
- Replies: 157
- Views: 35422
Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
why are we talking about this small matter of Hobbit's brain size? Why bring up all of this new stuff? Can Anita address these? The research clearly shows there are many transitional species. The single fraud that I know of is Piltdown man. Yes, Virginia, there are fraudulent scientists. Most, howev...
- Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:14 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Evidence for a Young Sun
- Replies: 58
- Views: 16366
Re: Evidence for a Young Sun
the fact that we aren't directly observing many phenomenon is simply the fact that is takes many times longer than a human lifespan. There is really nothing we can do about it. what do you think is going on in those pillars? That plus obscured by gas. So what we are actually seeing in these spectra...
- Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:58 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
- Replies: 157
- Views: 35422
Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
and supposedly whale brains and human brains are similar to each other. I guess whales will develop agriculture and a space program soon.
- Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:18 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Evidence for a Young Sun
- Replies: 58
- Views: 16366
Re: Evidence for a Young Sun
the fact that we aren't directly observing many phenomenom is simply the fact that is takes many times longer than a human lifespan. There is really nothing we can do about it. what do you think is going on in those pillars? //rsd.gsfc.nasa.gov/rsd/images/EGGs_lg.gif we have directly observed stars ...
- Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:09 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
- Replies: 157
- Views: 35422
Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
I think the relative size is unimportant, the actual structure of the brain (as in the extent of the cerebrum) is more important to the intelligence of this hominid.
- Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:01 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
- Replies: 157
- Views: 35422
Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
I assess this again by common sense. How so you might ask? And I will tell you by starting to examine the Island of Flores itself and adjacent islands where these Hobbit bones have been found - there are some pretty weird things going on there. A "natural selection" (not evolution) of the...
- Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:56 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Evidence for a Young Sun
- Replies: 58
- Views: 16366
Re: Evidence for a Young Sun
To me all of astronomy is still a non-observable science - can that which cannot be observed be considered a science? I mean were still bickering about tangible evidence concerning transient forms like Lucy the hominid. Here we have touchable evidence in our own hands and we still cant prove otherw...
- Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:46 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
- Replies: 157
- Views: 35422
Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
I'm not going to do the math for you since I feel at this point that you are just trolling for trouble. I did the research on the hominids for you, the rest you can muster up for yourself with a simple Google search. I have and I've found that it is impossible. The only sites that consider it possi...
- Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:44 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
- Replies: 157
- Views: 35422
Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
Himantolophus, I really think this is just a test to try and insult my intelligence. Either that or you are just trying to pry information out of me for your own selfish self. Or maybe, you are just an evil troll. no I'm not... see above Hmmm lets see… Nebraska man, Piltdown man, Swanscombe Cro-Mag...
- Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:21 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
- Replies: 157
- Views: 35422
Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
Anita: let me clarify a few things. 1. I am not a troll. I have posted on this forum intermittently for a while now 2. I apologize for the sarcasm on my last post. Sometimes typed words are easy to misinterpret as "attacking". BUT, as Zoegirl seems to agree, you are doing this to yourself....
- Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:04 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Montauk monster - what is it?
- Replies: 33
- Views: 8023
Re: Montauk monster - what is it?
looks like a badly rotted dog carcass. If they presented a view from the front it could be easier to figure it out. It looks to have paws, a tail, and the head of a pug or some other type of bulldog. The mouth area seems to be more decomposed than the rest of the head and body.
just my .02
just my .02
- Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:01 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Dinosaurs
- Replies: 50
- Views: 14309
Re: Dinosaurs
If refuting your arguments = troll, then aren't we all trolls then?
I always thought debating was presenting your point, defending it, and refuting what the opposition says? If Anita doesn't want to do this then what's the point of this thread then?
I always thought debating was presenting your point, defending it, and refuting what the opposition says? If Anita doesn't want to do this then what's the point of this thread then?
- Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:53 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
- Replies: 157
- Views: 35422
Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
Love your posts, but you get carried away into too many specifics. I don't deal well with people who tend to rip apart every minute detail and this includes trying to trap or degrade somebody (like me) into a finite cage. if you cannot defend your assertions, then why attempt to debate on a forum? ...
- Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:42 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
- Replies: 157
- Views: 35422
Re: Ultimate "blind" proof of Darwinian Evolution
I firmly stick by what I said. All the skeletons that have been found that suggest a transitional stage between ape and man have been altered in some way. Even Lucys pelvis was found to be sawed/filed to fit together to look somewhat human. you did not answer my question... do not assert . PROVE th...