tommyboy605182 ,
I am not familiar with Hawking's latest works. I just can't keep up on everything. That is good to hear that they are leaning to a start of time.
Search found 281 matches
- Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:12 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Infinity
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2389
- Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:15 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Is ID non-scientific because it has relgious implications?
- Replies: 299
- Views: 60895
Re: Is ID non-scientific because it has relgious implications?
Himantolophus , You say: "How do you assume you NEED added information to create a new species? If we haven't been able to "see" a new species form, then you have no proof that there is a required addition to the genome. " Darwin's theory starts with a cell and all species come f...
- Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:57 pm
- Forum: Questions for Christians
- Topic: God + love + hell = ?
- Replies: 84
- Views: 27221
Re: God + love + hell = ?
Hi all, Just a few thoughts about God making man. First of all God loves to create. The beauty in the universe and the possible beauty of man is testament to this. God desires to be recognized by the creatures He has given free will too. Now God could have made robots with no free will but that mean...
- Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:57 pm
- Forum: The Bible and Scripture
- Topic: Enoch?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3918
Re: Enoch?
johnt , The book of Enoch gives you a view into the world of spiritual warfare. If you really want to know about this subject then "The Handbook for Spiritual Warfare" is a great source. I read the prayers in the back to strengthen myself. It is the size of a dictionary but well worth the ...
- Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:48 pm
- Forum: The Bible and Scripture
- Topic: Enoch?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3918
Re: Enoch?
johnt , I have no corner on understanding the scriptures. But I do know that there are some documents out there that are not inspired and they actually contradict the Bible. Many are cleaver arguments that will mislead. Many will guide you to new age kind of thinking. Remember that the road to salva...
- Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:16 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Infinity
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2389
Re: Infinity
tommyboy605182,
Oh, and by the way causation requires that the branes have a beginning so the argument just gets shifted.
Oh, and by the way causation requires that the branes have a beginning so the argument just gets shifted.
- Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:09 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Infinity
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2389
Re: Infinity
tommyboy605182, Brane theory. That belongs in the sci-fi section of the book store. But you wanted to know how it avoids a beginning. Imagine many universes that exist as plain space in another dimension. To visualize this suspend several sheets of paper next to and parallel with each other. Now ima...
- Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:28 am
- Forum: Christian Theology
- Topic: controversial scriptures
- Replies: 139
- Views: 33216
Re: controversial scriptures
Jenna,
I understand your view I just don't agree with it.
I understand your view I just don't agree with it.
- Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:20 am
- Forum: Christian Theology
- Topic: controversial scriptures
- Replies: 139
- Views: 33216
Re: controversial scriptures
This one is a tough one for me. On one hand I know we have a loving God. So I know He wants all to come to Him. Our reward is to be with Him, He knows more than we do what we need. This of course is heaven. Now the people who chose to turn from God are not rewarded but punished. I have often wondere...
- Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:58 am
- Forum: The Bible and Scripture
- Topic: Enoch?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3918
Re: Enoch?
johnt, Be very careful of Kabbala. And all things not in the Cannon. The septuagent is a safe document. If you are doing study I would recommend the Chuck Missler commentaries. Then you can branch out with a solid understanding of scripture so you can separate the sheep from the goats. I know I was ...
- Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:34 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Evolution: The Evidence and the Critisism
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2213
Re: Evolution: The Evidence and the Critisism
Gman,
There is only one truth. A man in the Bible asked the question "what is truth", it happened that truth was standing in front of him.
There is only one truth. A man in the Bible asked the question "what is truth", it happened that truth was standing in front of him.
- Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:20 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Is ID non-scientific because it has relgious implications?
- Replies: 299
- Views: 60895
Re: Is ID non-scientific because it has relgious implications?
The Limits of ID K touched on this point and I would like to discuss it some more. If science places a marker on some element of biology and says that we do not know how this was made this is nothing but a formal statement of the facts. How that identification is made should not be the argument in f...
- Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:58 pm
- Forum: The Bible and Scripture
- Topic: resurrection
- Replies: 76
- Views: 20184
Re: resurrection
johnt, HI there, I looked over the link you provided. I think there are a bunch of assumptions there. I will have to go back and check the sequence again. My reference is the book The Coming Prince. I will reread and post something. I am in the middle of a few other studies. When I read The Coming P...
- Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:03 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Is ID non-scientific because it has relgious implications?
- Replies: 299
- Views: 60895
Re: Is ID non-scientific because it has relgious implications?
ARWallace, So Darwin's grand Idea is not a law. We both agree. If you think you can demonstrate evolution to your satisfaction thats great. To demonstrate it to me requires us to observe a new species made from natural selection with added information in the new species. This is the grand idea and I...
- Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:05 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Is ID non-scientific because it has relgious implications?
- Replies: 299
- Views: 60895
Re: Is ID non-scientific because it has relgious implications?
ARWallace , I will give you the point about Darwinism being a law. I want to make it perfectly clear that we are talking about an interpretation of data. I place Darwin's idea as a hypothesis and not a theory because it cannot be demonstrated. In fact he predicted things that have not happened. The ...