Evidence for God from Science

*Evolution is philosophy, not science. Its not observable or testable.*


I think you guys are on to something here. Seriously, you should go forward with this argument. The scientific community NEEDS you to go forward with this argument.

Yes, you did. I walked through it in detail, which you conveniently ignored (again). I clarified in detail right here: Okay, now we are back on topic. *shew* all that and finaly we get to discuss what the issue was to begin with. If you have forgotten after reading through your version of War and P...

I'll make this one simple: 2. You claim that the belief in God is not observable, and therefore not scientific. I MADE NO SUCH CLAIM!!!!!!!!! Your entire argument has been built on this false premise. I already explained to you that that was not the meaning behind my statement, yet you continue to m...

So you admit that a common designer could be a reasonable theory for shared materials (DNA)? Reasonable "theory?" No. Not remotely. Reasonable idea? Belief? Absolutely, as I had stated many times in this thread it is a belief I share. As for the rest of your post, it amounts to pointing a...

What is the single most positive example of observable macroevolution? http://tiktaalik.uchicago.edu/searching4Tik.html This link was already provided. Keep in mind, this piece of evidence alone does not equate to a scientific theory. You have to look at the entire body of evidence combined with a ...

Same question as above, do you really mean you have a problem if someone says "it could have started naturally without an intelligent designer"? You and I are on the same side of the issue here, but I just want to make a distinction. Mentioning that life starting with out an intelligent d...

Oh please. Tell you what. Since I'm just a theologian who doesn't understand science (despite my proof to the contrary), let me quote someone who answers this question themself who DOES understand science and Darwinism: The present lack of a definitely accept account of the origin f life should cer...

Okay JAC3510, its Friday, its raining, and I am bored. I think I will finaly attack your attempts at the filibuster. First off, lets get your tactics out of the way. As I said, I once spent weeks debating with you and wasting a lot of time moving the obstacles out of the way that you like to throw o...

Darwinism or neo-Darwinism is a materialist philosophy. Whenever you take science and question the meaning or origin of life like Darwin did in his book “Origin of Species” and others, then you are making a belief system out of science (abiogenesis), the answer for everything, your concerns, a set...

Barabus had evolved from a previous user?

Let me guess, you started out as a Barbarian...

You, sir, are a funny man.

Oh, so we are posting with multiple accounts are we?

On this forum? No. Barabus is my only account. I posted here under a different name a few years ago, but forgot what that was.

JAC and I have met on a different forum before.


Check the IP if you don't believe me.

So, here's the deal: if you want to engage my points directly, feel free, and we can have a rational discussion (assuming, of course, you can drop the logical fallacies). If you choose not to be so kind as to answer my questions, as I have so fully engaged yours, then you can continue to argue with...

What does a common ancestor have to do with anything? You don't think that macroevolution has anything to do with a common ancestor? This is news to me… But refuting whether or not that single common ancestor exists does not refute the process of evolution moving from one species to the next to the...

Well… Everything. If you can't create life from non-living matter, then how are you going to get this common ancestor that supposedly all life came from? It all has to start somewhere doesn't it? What does a common ancestor have to do with anything? God could have created 2 ancestors. he could have...

That's a dodge, thus the argument stands. If you can't refute it, you concede your error. In any case, if you are going to ignore an entire post that shows the fundamental error in your thinking, it would be something of a waste of time for me to give you anything like a response. JAC3510, I have w...