Search found 5452 matches
- Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:39 pm
- Forum: Creation Talk
- Topic: The Question of Design
- Replies: 54
- Views: 20375
Which model do you accept? What does that have to do with the discussion? My personal position has absolutely nothing to do with this. Nor does Rich's, anyone's on this discussion board's, Hugh Ross', Ken Hamm's, or even your own. The point was that you attacked my statement that the Cambrian explo...
- Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:13 pm
- Forum: Creation Talk
- Topic: The Question of Design
- Replies: 54
- Views: 20375
- Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:48 pm
- Forum: Creation Talk
- Topic: The Question of Design
- Replies: 54
- Views: 20375
Hi Jac. Sorry about that, my reference was from here: http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/cambrian/camb.html I assumed (perhaps wrongly) that the explosion lasted for the whole Cambrian period. Although, I do not think that PBS agrees (with reasons.org) as it states 30 million years as the time range. In ...
- Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:21 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Discussions
- Topic: clones
- Replies: 31
- Views: 13905
- Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:50 pm
- Forum: Creation Talk
- Topic: The Question of Design
- Replies: 54
- Views: 20375
Reference?James wrote:must actually mean 53 million years
These aren't the numbers I am thinking--try less than 10 million, and maybe less than 3 million. In case you don't check the footnotes on that article. PBS agrees
- Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:38 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Discussions
- Topic: clones
- Replies: 31
- Views: 13905
I don't see why a clone wouldn't have a soul . . . cloning, at least today, basically works through extremely fast development. You still have to go through the growth process. The body may be a replication, but why must the soul be? Again, we have to differentiate, I think, between the complex natu...
- Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:30 pm
- Forum: The Bible and Scripture
- Topic: Peter and Paul at Antioch
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3043
- Wed Jan 05, 2005 6:14 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Discussions
- Topic: clones
- Replies: 31
- Views: 13905
- Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:19 am
- Forum: Philosophical Discussions
- Topic: clones
- Replies: 31
- Views: 13905
There is soooo much I want to reply to, but the past few weeks have been so very, very hectic :( Anyway, I'm at work, so I don't have any time to comment now, but I just wanted to note that the more I think about this, the more I'm sold on (2). I think it just explains a lot of things in a lot of wa...
- Thu Dec 30, 2004 8:31 pm
- Forum: Creation Talk
- Topic: The Tsunami. Why Do Natural Disasters Happen?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 15083
- Thu Dec 30, 2004 6:40 am
- Forum: Christian Theology
- Topic: Once saved, always saved?
- Replies: 139
- Views: 47237
I've considered locking this thread a few times for two reasons: 1) neither side has said anything different for the past few pages--we're just going around and around in circles, and 2) comments are getting too personal. The only reason I haven't is that some new people may want to sift through all...
- Sun Dec 26, 2004 6:05 pm
- Forum: The Church
- Topic: The establishment of christianity
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3602
Good question . . . First, let me refer you to this article . It's a long read, but a great one. It covers seventeen reasons that Christianity should have never even gotten off the ground. I'd also recommend you pick up Lee Strobel's book, The Case for Christ . He has a chapter that deals with this ...
- Sun Dec 26, 2004 5:39 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Discussions
- Topic: clones
- Replies: 31
- Views: 13905
I'd say that I agree that in Adam's case, creationism applies. You'd almost have to, unless you were a theistic evolutionist. Like I said, I only adopted the position about a month ago or so (the objection I mentioned was really forceful in my mind!) . . . it's always possible to change again. Like ...
- Sat Dec 25, 2004 9:16 pm
- Forum: Creation Talk
- Topic: dinosaurs and man coexisted?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 43012
http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/appearance.html Just thought you guys might be interested in Rich's article concerning the appearance of age argument. He might be a little harsh in his language, but I think his points stand pretty well. That said, I've not studied the arguments than man and ...
- Sat Dec 25, 2004 9:01 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Discussions
- Topic: clones
- Replies: 31
- Views: 13905
I actually held that position, MM, until about a month ago. There are basically three positions on it. 1) Creationism: God gives each person a soul at some time during development (probably conception) 2) Traducianism: The soul is transmitted along with the body through the process of natural genera...