Search found 8 matches

by maxplanck
Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:33 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Creationist Explanation for Bigfoot, Lochness, etc
Replies: 59
Views: 16224

Re: Creationist Explanation for Bigfoot, Lochness, etc

As a Young Earth creationist believer, I've long been interested in what reputable creation scientists have to say to explain many of the mysterious creatures that conventional science has yet to embrace, or even study, such as Bigfoot (or it's cousins), the Lochness Monster, and other such creatur...
by maxplanck
Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:12 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Bacterial Flagellum not irreducibly complex?
Replies: 26
Views: 7443

Re: Bacterial Flagellum not irreducibly complex?

Listing the steps leading to a sophisticated toxin delivery system that then could become a flagellum is beyond my capabilities, but I have faith (yeah "faith" :ewink: ) in the scientific community and the scientific method that plausible steps do exist. A progression such as ... developi...
by maxplanck
Sun Apr 19, 2009 5:10 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: evolution rebuttal
Replies: 105
Views: 26048

Re: evolution rebuttal

Division is how cells reproduce, whether they are independent single-cell organisms or a part of a multi-cell organism. Asexual reproduction of multi-cell organisms by division or by sloughing off small "seeds" is the logical extension of the established form of reproduction used by singl...
by maxplanck
Sat Apr 18, 2009 2:25 pm
Forum: God and Science
Topic: evolution rebuttal
Replies: 105
Views: 26048

Re: evolution rebuttal

The "parent" and "offspring" are distinct individuals, living lives independent of one another, and most likely dieing at different times. In the case of starfish, it's easy to see that the "parent" and "offspring" are clearly as independent of one another as...
by maxplanck
Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:23 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Human Genome change rate increasing?
Replies: 24
Views: 5207

Re: Human Genome change rate increasing?

For full article, see: http://discovermagazine.com/2009/mar/09-they-dont-make-homo-sapiens-like-they-used-to Article by Kathlene McAuliffe For decades the consensus view—among the public as well as the world's preeminent biologists—has been that human evolution is over. Since modern Homo sapiens em...
by maxplanck
Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:52 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: evolution rebuttal
Replies: 105
Views: 26048

Re: evolution rebuttal

But this miraculous creation of life came with a complete and completely functional reproductive system. Thus this living thing was born with the solution to a problem which did not yet exist; hence, such a solution could not have been formed through experience. The most primitive (ie single-celled...
by maxplanck
Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:13 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: evolution rebuttal
Replies: 105
Views: 26048

Re: evolution rebuttal

In the beginning, the earth was without form, and void. There was not life; there was not death. There was not reasonable expectation of life; hence, there was not reasonable expectation of death. And it came to pass in the process of time that life was created. But there was still not reasonable e...
by maxplanck
Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:48 am
Forum: God and Science
Topic: Homochirality
Replies: 3
Views: 1155

Homochirality

Why is homochirality such a show-stopper for macroevolutionary theory? What common arguments are used to support the evolution of homochirality? What evidence is there , pro or con?