Search found 40 matches
- Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:10 am
- Forum: Politics and World Events
- Topic: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
- Replies: 21
- Views: 6485
Re: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
Again I'm not saying that this is "the" complete answer to the question. Then i have misunderstood you, my observation of the discussion concluded that you did. Although I would say that it is probably the most plausible. I agree with this, but from what i have read there appears to be mo...
- Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:47 pm
- Forum: Politics and World Events
- Topic: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
- Replies: 21
- Views: 6485
Re: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
Gman, We are talking about this incident and none other. What you are doing again and again is bringing a connection that could or could not be there. In your view (as i can only percieve by these posts), any aggresive act by a Muslim MUST BE a jihad.The findings in the other 2 incidents brought EMP...
- Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:54 am
- Forum: Politics and World Events
- Topic: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
- Replies: 21
- Views: 6485
Re: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
you are also not seeing the big picture there. Thats an assumption not a reality.In what manner do you base your view? If you read my posts you would see clearly that i have highlighted more than one option to the incident, with a wider scope of causality. What outcry would there have been had the ...
- Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:57 am
- Forum: Politics and World Events
- Topic: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
- Replies: 21
- Views: 6485
Re: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
What other comments are you referring to? 1. What makes this video more enlighting than any other?, 2. "a war on terrorism" (what does that actually mean?who is it actually refering too - all terrorism or only that which the U.S. goverment view as terrorism?), 3. why did not the U.S. Army...
- Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:20 am
- Forum: Politics and World Events
- Topic: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
- Replies: 21
- Views: 6485
Re: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
i did not see the second part to your post so i will reply to it now. attended the controversial Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Great Falls, Virginia, in 2001 at the same time as two of the September 11 terrorists, This is 2009, this happened in 2001, only 8 yrs differance. Does it only take 7 years to be ...
- Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:09 am
- Forum: Politics and World Events
- Topic: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
- Replies: 21
- Views: 6485
Re: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
I take it you are not familiar with the Koran and it's teachings. If you would like I could walk you through it. Thank you for the kind manner in which to instruct me in the ways of the Qur'an but there is no need. I read and understand what you have said, yet your conclusion to my view is no great...
- Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:25 pm
- Forum: Politics and World Events
- Topic: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
- Replies: 21
- Views: 6485
Re: Robert Spencer discusses the Fort Hood Jihadist
What makes this video more enlighting than any other? it is nothing more than just another persons perspective.A radical one at that, since he views the event from a totality perspective of the war , "a war on terrorism" (what does that actually mean?who is it actually refering too - all t...
- Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:15 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Are the psychological stereotypes correct?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1408
Re: Are the psychological stereotypes correct?
Gabrielman, what you have highlighted is the prejudice that can affect the view of the stereotype. The question that needs to be validated; is the over all view of stereotypes in the positive or negative. I see both as relevent, but lean more to the positive aspects. Stereotypes have several importa...
- Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:18 pm
- Forum: Questions for Christians
- Topic: Morals without god/the bible
- Replies: 448
- Views: 81210
Re: Morals without god/the bible
Proinsias, Sorry for the excessively long response. We need to minimise our discussion and if possable limit our referance to support our view. Your perception of morality is very Hedonistic.The issue i have with this view is that you cannot and will not be able to see what your morality actually br...
- Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:47 pm
- Forum: Questions for Christians
- Topic: Morals without god/the bible
- Replies: 448
- Views: 81210
Re: Morals without god/the bible
Proinsias, i know i have said allot but i need to address this statement separately. If you break the law then you face the consequences of the law, if you get caught. The crux of this statement - which is ver insighful on your part is " if you get caught " With God you will get caught! Th...
- Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:52 pm
- Forum: Questions for Christians
- Topic: Morals without god/the bible
- Replies: 448
- Views: 81210
Re: Morals without god/the bible
proinsias "No man is an island" and although i do empathise with you in this view, we both know it is not a reality.The "Greater Good" is the premise for how society has developed and it is in this dynamic we find ourselves, and must address. Either that or we go hermit and live ...
- Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:50 pm
- Forum: Questions for Christians
- Topic: Morals without god/the bible
- Replies: 448
- Views: 81210
Re: Morals without god/the bible
i doubled up on my reply and not sure how to delete ?
- Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:24 am
- Forum: Questions for Christians
- Topic: Morals without god/the bible
- Replies: 448
- Views: 81210
Re: Morals without god/the bible
proinsias, If I write something in an objective manner does that then make it objective? The issue is not that you (by your view point) write something in an objecive manner, but that you have the authority to guide the moral code and not permit the option of subjective interpretation.Only an absolu...
- Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:22 am
- Forum: New Page Critiques
- Topic: Just War Theory
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4261
Re: Just War Theory
Gman, It looks ok, but i do feel you need to ensure that people do not get confused with milhemet mitzvah (commanded wars) by God and how these could be construde as kedushah (holiness of war) you have not defined the differance. I referance this in regards to the wars ( milhemet mitzvah ) of Joshua...
- Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:34 pm
- Forum: Questions for Christians
- Topic: Morals without god/the bible
- Replies: 448
- Views: 81210
Re: Morals without god/the bible
quote="waynepii"]Why does discussion of the GR always come down to semantics rather than substance? The concept is very simple - do unto others as you would have them do unto you". What's the problem? [/quote] So what is the substance?Is it actually that simple and what is the problem...