Evidence for God from Science

I am entirely with you what He can. In either case, it would be accurate to say that God did not "know ahead of time that Job will remain faithful", even if He was consciously limiting His omniscience. That was my point. In any case, many Bible scholars argue that, based on the genre of th...

Maybe he created us as rats to experiment on. Or maybe he created as his dying wish. Or maybe something we can't understand. Millions of possibilities.

B.W. wrote:I'll open this up by trying to answer this one: Didn't God know before Time that Job will remain faithful?

If yes (which I don't agree with), it makes Satan look dumber than a box of rocks. Placing a bet with an omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent God.

How about this one: Daughter Babylon, doomed to destruction... Blessed are those who seize your infants and dash them against the rocks (Psalms 137:8-9) Let's be honest - if this is not barbarically ugly, then I don't know what is. God Himself says elsewhere the the Bablyon girl's infants will be &q...

Revelations says that you will be there forever. Still, some don't take this literally because of how full of allegory and symbolism the book is (and there are some earlier biblical texts that use similar phrases Revelation does, "forever and ever" in particular, to figuratively describe t...

It seems to me that he is asking for a "scientific explanation" of how fire can cause harm to a spiritual object. After all, why else is this in the "God and Science" sub-forum?

Of course, no one can answer that because we don't know what a soul is "made of".

There is really no argument except "it just really feels that there is an objective moral realm".

Your sense of humour and words elsewhere appear to betray your profile. Shouldn't you be updating your profile already? ;) This is really funny considering I took the picture from a famous Christian apologist: http://www.gregboyd.org/blog/a-report-an-fyi-and-a-chuckle/ Go ahead and don't believe me...

I don't have to explain inherent knowledge of right and wrong, because it isn't inherent, it's taught. so, it isn't inherently wrong to kill 6 million jews because you don't like their race? it isn't inherently wrong to molest children.? Are you saying these are just prefences of the culture that y...

EDIT: Double post.

Craig's argument is essentially that God has mysterious purposes embellished with big words and verbosity.

Science should not be based on observations; but only upon the Bible's teachings. Men should never believe what they see with their own eyes, if what they see disagrees with the Bible. Scientists should never publish explanations, theories, or ideas for others to read if they can be construed in an...

Rich wrote:Atheists would prefer a world in which the conscience is never tweaked.

"Atheist" and "sociopath" aren't synonymous.

They are finite in consequence.