Evidence for God from Science

Science is based upon verifiable evidence. I came to understand that my beliefs were without rational justification and without evidentiary support. I reverted to the null hypothesis: There is no god. I have yet to find any convincing evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Simple as that.. A simpl...

I just started into this one last night, but words fail me as to why this experiment should be remotely compelling. Is this what passes for evidence these days? The study is headed by Richard Lenski, and purports to demonstrate the evolution of complex features using digital code. Here's the abstrac...

I believe in god 100% and there's alot of people out there who ask for god for help and receive helps from god or give them miracles but the thing I dont understand those who about to die or really bad postion and ask god to save them why doesn't god save them from being kill or out of the situatio...

i'm sorry that i don't like to sweep the problems under the rug. I see. So you post links from other people for us to respond to, rather than engage in a conversation with us personally about what you and we believe -- rather impolite I'd say. Even so, since you don't like to sweep the problems und...

recently I was pinned down in presenting the Personal God hypothesesis when I was charged that the idea was narcissistic in nature. An investigation of the Biblical claims might be helpful: The Ten Commandments The Two Great Commandments Jesus washing the feet of the disciples (servant-leadership) ...

Zoe, appreciate what you are saying, but not really what I'm driving at. I understand that evolution has no goal. But anyone, including Darwinists will speak of the function of the eye, kidney, etc. Yet recognizing function is standing on teleological grounds. That is taboo territory. Function indi...

Just an off-topic question... but after reading the comments it came across my mind. Who hijacked the term 'fundamental' and made it into a bad word? Shouldn't we all want to be true to the fundamentals of our belief system? It's just one of an almost limitless number of infectious political schema...

Gman wrote:Not to worry... If you understand their philosophy then you will understand their science.

I've never seen it put better. Bravo.

- N

I was really, really annoyed to read this... I remember back them I was single, without a girlfriend... I thought : "Hell, if somebody tells me something like what Jesus said, I wouldn't want to have anything with him, I would tell him to get away from me"... Zvez, If for the sake of disc...

An atheist would immediately claim that a moral creature would never create such tests. And an immoral one would not create all life and a magnificent universe in which they might life. He would also not give the greatest possible sacrifice toward saving them from self-inflicted death. - Nathan

You see there are some elements within nature (like DNA) that resemble manmade, or intelligently designed, objects. I don"t know if it started with Stephen Meyer, but I am interested in the arguments for describing genetic code as "information". Naturally, as a creationist I would te...

Ivellious wrote:Yeah, but "they" in the case of the Egyptians were thousands of enslaved workers...Noah had what, 4 guys and 4 women? Not quite the same as an enslaved army.

And animals, gravity, and presumably a relatively bare mountain to roll the logs down.

- N

ultimate777 wrote: If enough interest is shown and I can get up the energy I may try to explain what I mean. But my thoughts are no means origional, so some of you may guess what I am talking about.

I think you should, because I have no idea what you mean, and don't agree to boot.

- N

Would knowing without a doubt that God exists really negate free will? ... However, I am having trouble giving up my sins. This is a very important question, but also very heavily loaded given your honest confession. I'll offer up the following collection of answers to your question: 1. Peter's den...

That is where the science ends. And that is precisely the problem. Science is elevated from a tool to a universal truth, equated with rationality, and (mis)used as a means of political authority. Reason assigns little validity to the assertions and fruits of creativity in logic or art - how much le...