Evidence for God from Science

No you misunderstood, I meant to say all conclusions in science are subject to scrutiny. If I misunderstood, it was because of this: Quote: On what basis then do you assume anything that science describes to be true? Elsewhere you agreed that there are certain fundamental underpinnings to science, ...

Hey, I have someone who barely knows what he's talking about (NO NOT ME) talking about a guy named Fox and protocells-what the heck is that? I've googled it, but not much space is given to protocells... Dr. Syndey Fox's work along with Stanley L. Miller and Harold C. Urey experiment form the basis ...

Hi! I just joined the forum to ask the following question; nonetheless, I am looking forward to following the discussions here. I am in a small group that is reading Hugh Ross' The Creator and the Cosmos. Today, several of the group (non-scientists) were asking why the "stretchiness" of t...

And BGoodForGoodSake since you don't believe that jesus was/is son of God, then why would you state that you are not fit to be mentioned in the same sentence with him? If he is not the son of god, then he was just a man. And all men were created equal. it's just a enquiring confused mind wants to k...

BGood, I'm just wondering what you think of the Christian article at http://www.str.org/free/solid_ground/SG0105.htm (you may need to login first, but if you don't want to register you can simply login with kurieuo[at]godandscience.org (replacing the [at] with @)). I personally think it has some va...

I will not wrong back, I will not try to punish. So you turn the other cheak? I'm ok with that. :D I think its important to understand that one's morality is not one's salvation. Jesus is our salvation - that is the message to be considered. It seems I've run into a great many people who refuse to ...

I will not wrong back, I will not try to punish. So you turn the other cheak? I'm ok with that. :D I think its important to understand that one's morality is not one's salvation. Jesus is our salvation - that is the message to be considered. It seems I've run into a great many people who refuse to ...

Darwin was biased. What do you think his bias was? And how did it influence his theory? I assume nothing ever in the history of science is true. It is all subject to criticism. If all premises are false, are all the conclusions false too? I'm must say, I'm a bit surprised by this position. If your ...

Because what should be proof in the Koran? In the Koran, Muhammed goes around, claiming to be a prophet, and when someone asks for proof through miracles, all he ever does is tell them to go read a verse in the Koran-only in the Hadith, which came centuries after Muhammed, do you see any miracles.....

No the evidence is nature itself, natural selection is an explanation. Not according to Darwin. Was he wrong? Darwin was biased. All humanity is. On what basis then do you assume anything that science describes to be true? Elsewhere you agreed that there are certain fundamental underpinnings to sci...

BGoodForGoodSake I could be wrong, but I do believe that your spiritual beliefs are not so different to some of the teachings of Jesus Christ. They all fall under the commandment taught by him to love your fellow man. (all those you stated in your post anyway) 8) Did you realize that your following...

What is irreducible complexity, it is not an observation. The observation is complexity the conclusion is that it is irreducible. This "fact" that it is irreducible is separate from the observations. It is indeed not an observation in itself. I think you misunderstood what IC means. Think...

AttentionKMartShoppers wrote:Do I accept the Koran as proof of what? Of the moon god Allah's poor mathematical skills? Yes.

Am I correct it interpreting the above as ridicule?

If so then that is my point that proof for one is nonsence for another.

Having posted tirelessly in this board to clarify what science really is , I grow tired. Throughout my postings I have been wary of sharing what my beleifs are. I feel, having posted so voluminously on this board, that I owe this community a glimpse and perhaps more on what it is that feed my spiri...

I don't understand what you mean? How is it circular? Because then evidence given for natural selection is in as much need of proof as natural selection itself. But Darwin already solved that problem, he just assumed it as a principle. If natural selection is not a principle in your opinion, what i...