Evidence for God from Science

. I was just wondering why athiests are so adamant to prove that Dark matter exists. Other Apologetics sites seem to hate the idea of Dark Matter/ Dark Energy. I don't understand the reasoning behind it. If there is Dark matter, the universe still has a beginning - that hasn't changed - The only th...

numeral2_5 wrote:So David what do you think about this leopard thing?

The definition of a species is reproduction within the type. If these black leopards can reproduce with other leopards then it is microevolution.

...[/quote]

By definition macroevolution is a result of many microevolution events, so how does one observe it?[/quote]

The Cambrian Explosion shows no evidence of many microevolution events. Darwin cannot explain it, but it was a 5 million year macroevolutionary process

Kmart: I agree with you. Crisis is much too strong a word. Penrose in his book, the Road to Reality, expects a new brilliant paradigm from some 'subtle change in perspective---something that we all have missed...' The mysteries at the quantum level play into my theory that the emergence of conscious...

we do not have any explanation for what happened before Planck time. That's because the physics breakdown - General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are incompatible at the extreme of T < Planck Time. Hence physicists are searching for a (badly named) Theory of Everything with likes of string theor...

If I may drop in on the Multiverse discussion, the mathematical theories are simply mental masturbation to avoid the issue of hot big bang as a creation. Two quotes: "theoretical physics has become a refined form of creative play, in which testing out wacky ideas continuously outruns experiment...

Its a possibility. But at this point there is no evidence for or against .[/quote] The other issue in the article in creation science is the statement that clocks in tall buildings run slower, and that the slowing is due to gravity. Clocks in satellites run slower due to the velocity of the satelli...

The deduction here is incorrect. Einstein's relativity theories that time is not constant is based on the principal that c is constant. Therefore, whatever the frame of reference the speed of light is the same. So on the edge of the authors universe time would go extremely slow on earth compared to...

Davies is a wonderful example of a scientist who stopped to look at scientific findings and began to wonder. He is a theoretical quantum gravity researcher from Australia. As I have followed his books he has gone from atheistic or perhaps agnostic to a Deist in the purest sense. He feels the the uni...

Kurieuo: Thanks for accepting me on board. My interest in reconciling Genesis and science comes from my own studies in order to finally decide if I should remain agnostic or return to faith in God by studying the 'facts' presented by science. Those scientific findings logically demand a return to be...

:!: I am new to this site and I hope you don't mind a visitor who is Jewish and who has proven to himself that the last 150 years of science prove God exists beyond a reasonable doubt, by the method of Mortimer J. Adler. Some of the confusion I have seen in the current discussion can be helped by re...