Search found 116 matches
- Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:52 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: The Scientific Method of ID
- Replies: 115
- Views: 26914
- Fri Feb 03, 2006 7:52 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: The Scientific Method of ID
- Replies: 115
- Views: 26914
- Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:24 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: 'How Life Began'
- Replies: 98
- Views: 22609
No. You won't ebelieve the evidences anyway. If you are interested do your own investigation I have done the research, that's why I need you to provide evidence for what you're claiming. It's not in any of the scientific journals I've searched. I definitely be willing to address credible evidence s...
- Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:00 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: 'How Life Began'
- Replies: 98
- Views: 22609
Are you trying to prove a negative again? Also man is not a primitive primate and there is ample evidence to show that he existed with dinos. All I can say at this point is...Wow....can you provide some citations to the studies you're referring to that suggest humans and dinos coexisted? Really why...
- Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:54 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: The Prediction of Intelligent Design
- Replies: 55
- Views: 11035
Because evolution 1) makes a metaphysical claim or two, and 2) is not about explaining how things work, but how they came to work. Point #1 is absolutely false..there are metaphysical implications, if people want to make them, concerning the results of evolutionary studies, but evolutionary science...
- Thu Jan 26, 2006 7:19 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Evolution is a common characteristic of Intelligent design
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3798
- Mon Jan 23, 2006 7:29 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Flood and Ark
- Replies: 192
- Views: 50212
Ha. If I use part of an article, I do not say all the article is good. But the fact that you cut out half of a sentence to make a statement fit your argument, and the rest of the statement itself says something completely different, that is what is underhanded about your approach. I could use a sim...
- Sun Jan 22, 2006 7:07 pm
- Forum: Moral and Ethical Affairs
- Topic: Homosexuality - Genetic OR Behavioral?
- Replies: 147
- Views: 42626
Well, according to your worldview...there is no right and wrong, so why not beat gays to death...or straight people for that matter. I wait your self-defeating reply Did I miss something here, or did you just decide for yourself what her world view is? Maybe it was posted elsewhere, because I don't...
- Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:38 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Hyper Evolution pre flood
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1390
I think there was very fast adaptation before the flood. This is why all cats, for example could come from the one pair quickly. This is how mammoths adapted to the ice, etc. Now if you want this to be a scientific theory as opposed to simply an unsupported belief, how do propose testing these idea...
- Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:59 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Fossil Fuels and Flood
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1533
Is it reasonable to assume that once all the fossil fuel is burned up, that the system will be closer to what it was in preflood days? Although I don't bellieve in the theory of the great flood, this question can be addressed. If you look at the forms that carbon, hydrogen, etc. were theorized to b...
- Thu Jan 12, 2006 7:57 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Love
- Replies: 32
- Views: 8375
Thought this may be of interest to this thread:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4478040.stm
It tells of Italian scientists' research concerning physiology and love...small sample size, but I guess it's something...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4478040.stm
It tells of Italian scientists' research concerning physiology and love...small sample size, but I guess it's something...
- Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:36 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Mutation and evolution
- Replies: 69
- Views: 16012
- Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:14 am
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: Fossil Fuels and Flood
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1533
- Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
- Forum: God and Science
- Topic: A New ANTI-Evolution website!!!
- Replies: 58
- Views: 15835
The theory of evolution states that modern birds are descendants of the dinosaurs. So, VERY large complex reptiles emerged from the VERY small fish of the ancient seas, had their fun, then decided to get VERY small and grow wings and fly?! LOL! Question #4 Can you show the transitional fossils for ...
- Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:23 pm
- Forum: Philosophical Discussions
- Topic: Why Are There Even Atheists?
- Replies: 94
- Views: 26250
Why don't you show me where I have given any inaccurate citations? And he did not give any citations, accurate or not, simply made a claim. Anyhow, it seems that you wish to define what accurate citations mean, that being all of those that agree with evolution or whatever point of view you support....