Evidence for God from Science

(Yehren observes that the vast majority of biologists accept evolution) ARE you claiming this as evidence for evolution? When I want my car repaired, I don't go to an accountant. Silly as it sounds, I have this idea that people who understand the subject are more likely to know it. This is the comed...

(Barbarian asks for the last great scientist to put religion into his theories) The only offering? Richard Dawkins: I think you just proved my point for me, August. Dawkins is a competent scientist, when he doesn't let his fury against religion get the better of him. A great scientist, he isn't. Thi...

I'm sorry, but the RCC does not recognize the ToE unconditionally. Neither do scientists. They only accept what the evidence says, and that is conditional on new evidence not changing it. That's a good thing. It very clearly states that the version of evolution they underwrite is a guided process, ...

The judge is simply wrong to think that the supernatural has been outside of science for centuries. IT hasn't even been two centuries yet. Hmmm... the last great scientist who included religious notions in his theories? Far as I know it was Kepler, about 1650. And his great work, Kepler's laws came...

The Catholic Church recognizes that evolution is completely compatible with Christian faith. Orthodox Christians generally agree, although a few aberrant churches deny evolution. However, the Church recognizes that science is one thing and faith is another. So it's not a doctrine, nor should it be. ...

Becuase animal bones are in the ground.
Because animals vary.
Some Joe Scientist drew a chart.

Therefore evolution!

Nope. Someone had a little fun with your trust on that one. Why not learn what it really says? At very least, you wouldn't be making mistakes like that one.

LOL. The evidence doesn't say anyhting, and you interpret it based on assumptions. Sorry, the old "you can't objectively evaluate evidence" argument isn't going to help you. No one believes it. Further all I see here are more claims. Did you have anyhting real again I will say that proovi...

According to Ernest Rutherford, he acknowledged that the Earth was much older. Rutherford, then a young scientist, was very careful to say that Kelvin had himself predicted that the Earth might be very old, if some unknown source of heat could be found. He then said that such a source (radium) had b...

Yehren observes: My take on it is that only God is eternal, always having existed, and that He created all things. Clearly, that creation was both instantaneous, in which He created the universe, and ongoing, in which it continues to unfold. So if God created all things, and since you insist on sepe...

I hope one can distinguish between scientists (who can logically make religious claims) and science (which cannot).

Yehren observes: My take on it is that only God is eternal, always having existed, and that He created all things. Clearly, that creation was both instantaneous, in which He created the universe, and ongoing, in which it continues to unfold. Quote: So if God created all things, and since you insist ...

That's what discussion boards are for. People are smarter than generally thought. Toss out the claims, and let them be sorted out.

AS I said I am not against biology. I have no desire to learn anymore about evolution. I have weighed the evidence for it, and couldn't find any. You would still benefit by knowing what it is, if only to try to refute it. You have a lot of misconceptions about the theory. I care not what mechanisms...

Yehren observes: Darwin replied that the evidence from biology showed that it must be much older. Kelvin eventually accepted that he was wrong, and Darwin was right. What evidence from biology? Fossil record. Observed rates of variation. Transitionals. Things like that. That is garbage specualtion. ...

Yehren wrote: My take on it is that only God is eternal, always having existed, and that He created all things. Clearly, that creation was both instantaneous, in which He created the universe, and ongoing, in which it continues to unfold. So if God created all things, and since you insist on seperat...