Evidence for God from Science

Yehren suggests: Maybe you should define "transitional." There seem to be a great many number of them... Really? Is that why you seem to be having problems naming even one? I've discussed a good number of them here. Yehren suggests: I think a Christian evolutionist is more reliable (to a M...

Yehren observes: And not just post-fall. To make enough room on the Ark, creationists must imagine post-flood rates of evolution that would produce new species of mammals weekly or monthly. Yet no one seems to have found this process to be remarkable; at least no one ever commented on it. Actually i...

Then by definition, you have a completely different species of elephant in every single zoo in America, because due to their captivity, the elephants cannot reproduce with the any elephants outside the zoo. They can't reproduce with any in the next cage, either. I think you understand the differenc...

And here's another one: "Let Darwinism loose in an electronics lab and just watch what it creates. A lean, mean machine that nobody understands. Clive Davidson reports:... It is unremarkable that a microprocessor can perform such a task--except in this case. Even though the circuit consists of ...

"Dr. Gove wrote back the very next day, as did one of his colleagues. By sheer coincidence, they are currently studying this exact question. It turns out that the origin and concentration of 14C in fossil fuels is important to the physics community because of its relevance for detection of sol...

It is Chinese for "Barbarian." Or "wild man."

On Technetium

Also there is a huge resevoir 47 miles under MT Everest.

Could you give us a link for that?

Yehren, you seem to be saying that the opinion of the majority is the only one that counts. No. I have pointed out that there are good and learned people on all sides of the question. Using that same argument then we can say that 1940 Germans were justified in their actions (the majority supported ...

Apostle: 1. One of a group made up especially of the 12 disciples chosen by Jesus to preach the gospel. 2. A missionary of the early Christian Church. A leader of the first Christian mission to a country or region. 3. One of the 12 members of the administrative council in the Mormon Church. 4. a.One...

This 'majority' thing is meaningless and you know where I come from. It only says what Christians say about evolution. Most of them agree that evolution is consistent with our faith. You could argue that Christians have it wrong, of course. That's conceivable, but I don't think it's very likely. Yo...

Astonishing then, that the one time we test it on a known date, it worked.

You're trying to tell us the sky isn't blue. Not a very good start.

But Yehren says we know what causes it, God is (at the very least) the secondary cause. No Yehren did not say that. Please don't invent positions for me. Yehren on mutations: It is termed random because we cannot know when it occurs or what caused it. I thought mutations, gene drift and natural sel...

Did you not go to the link that tells you how evolutionary processes are making aircraft engineering better? It's not just aircraft, either. Here's some more for you to learn about... "Convergent Thinking Applies Darwinism to Develop Better Diesel Engines by Erin Hatfield Computer-aided testing...

Yehren Tell me about Jesus, What was his role in creation? If you're a Christian, then you know He is God, existing eternally with the Father and the Holy Spirit. Do you accept that? If so, then it follows that Jesus is also the Creator, who made all things. Does Jesus, have an impact in the World ...

The most important thing to scientists is that the method works when tested. As you see, it does. The ultimate test is to see if it works on a known date. And it did. And yes, there are many possible ways to mess up an analysis. This is why only experienced people should do them. In spite of all the...