Evidence for God from Science

Greetings Jay_7, Your are on the right track. Just don't put too much stock in the "Big Bang" model. As proposed, it is totally out of line with the Bible; meaning the facts that it is based on must be re-aligned with the Genesis account. Check out Dr. Humphreys book, Starlight and Time fo...

Greetings Kurieuo, You wrote: I prefer to take even more on Faith, and believe that God would faithfully (not deceitfully) reveal Himself through creation, and that this would be compatible with God's word. I agree that you are on the right track by saying "God would faithfully (not deceitfully...

Jerickson314 stated: The fact is, the distances of stars have been expanding since creation, as observed red shift has demonstrated. However, extrapolations date the beginning of the expansion, when the stars were close together, to being billions of years in the past. This is where some questions a...

Greetings Jerickson 312. jerickson314 writes: "What about believing Christians who believe that the facts point to an old universe?. "In fact, it was facts that converted me to an old-earth position from my previous young-earth position . To what "facts" do you refer? Are you sur...

Dear Jay_7 Just to let you know I read your reply; Thank you! I am glad the article was a blessing to you. This post is like "peer review" my desire is to turn it into a tract to help put anyone open to the truth on the right track. The feed back here will help me to strengthen it more. Th...

Jbuza,

Greetings and thanks for the reply. The key is what you stated, "in what they choose to believe." How ever the facts don't lie, only their interpretation does. In the words of Dr Steven C. Meyer, "Science, done right, points toward God."

To the Barbarian Greetings. Thank you for your input but mabe I missed something; what particular point are you trying to make? You mention "closure temperature" which Dr. Humphries very clearly points out is irrelevant by stating "Even if the Jemez zircons had gone below their closur...

Radiometric Dating Confirms a Young Age for the Earth By Allen J. Dunckley, Th.D. (C)-NOvember 2005 Because of media hype, many people are under the assumption that radiometric dating has confirmed that the earth is very old - 4.6 billion years old to be exact. However, what is not well known by th...