Evidence for God from Science

Pierson this is kind of off topic but could I ask you a question? The church that your girlfriend is currently attending, are they the fire and brimestone kind of church or do they teach about Gods love for us? Have you asked her this? Not a problem. Well, she only attends during holidays with her ...

It is not an ad hominim assumption since everything was a question. This type of response is why I asked the questions to begin with. If both of us are speaking the same language then how did you miss the clearly defined questions? Ad hominem attacks can't be questions? Are you stupid? (that was an...

Thank you both for the kind words and citations (bippy). Philip, what's your take on say, someone who is ignorant about the rules you put forth (someone who has never seen, or heard of the Christian Bible)? Such as isolated populations of people. What happens to them? Bippy, I thought I'd bring up t...

Spatiotemporal chemical dynamics in living cells: From information trafficking to cell physiology Molecular sciences, including molecular biology, genomics, proteomics, and crystallography, have now described life in unprecedented depth and breadth. Yet these descriptions have not improved signific...

Pierson ask yourself why a forger would even want or need to use blood from a tortured human being to place on the shroud????? If a gone were a middle age forger, any blood would do. Would you Pierson as a middle age forger would ever think anyone would ever know the difference between regular bloo...

This is obviously going no where. From your previous link when you were defining IR: If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find out no such ...

Because no artist in history ever used blood in a painting? Again, I'm not trying to argue with you guy's, but to me, this is not a very convincing argument. Hypothetically speaking, let's say the shroud was re-examined, more samples were taken, everyone agreed on the area to remove, etc.... All res...

While I actually do appreciate your ability to gather all these different papers on this topic, they're all pretty interesting (I only read every other one or so), I wonder if you notice that none of them support the hypothesis of ID nor deny the theory of biological evolution.. They simply raise q...

You can try to establish that 'mystery parts' aren't used as evidence, but you would first have to point to where I assert mystery parts as evidence. If you want to have an intellectual intercourse about this system you need to become familiar with how matter can be spatially and temporally control...

I have never heard of the other 2 journals Pierson and are u sure that these are peer reviewed. I doubt they are. I see that you brought up the microscope magazine again. We allready talked about that magazine. Would you care to let us know who the owner of this magazine is? That's right, non other...

I am not familiar enough with the body of literature to even guess. I'm not sure. I was merely focusing on this particular citation. Would you agree, however, that much of it is still undiscovered (origins unknown)? then a fair question here is why are you attempting to discuss this subject? To agr...

Bippy, didn't Mccrone get his work published in a couple of journals? Experimental details on the tests carried out by McCrone are available in five papers published in three different peer-reviewed journal articles: The Microscope 28, p. 105, 115 (1980); The Microscope 29, p. 19 (1981); Wiener Beri...

They still believe "X," haha!" . Well. When one still keeps holding on to the idea that paint makes up the image and that there is no blood on the shroud I can't help but laugh. Or thinking McCrones work is reliable. Very amateur stuff. Well, why not go in there and link some citatio...

I am quite aware of indirect testing. This type of testing presupposes the existence of what you are testing for and if you get a result that appears favorable then you infer the existence of what you presupposed. Got it. Know it. And yet you still did not provide any method to test the subjects I ...

I am not familiar enough with the body of literature to even guess. I'm not sure. I was merely focusing on this particular citation. Would you agree, however, that much of it is still undiscovered (origins unknown)? then a fair question here is why are you attempting to discuss this subject? To agr...