Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
- Zvezdichko
- Acquainted Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:25 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
Sup peeps,
I think that one of the strongest arguments against theism and Christianity is the argument from bad design...
I had some very nasty choking experiences and they even grew up into fear of choking. I had fear when eating my food. I overcame my fears, but in the end I'm a biologist... It seems that we really are so badly designed that we just can't had been created by a loving God.
What do you think?
I think that one of the strongest arguments against theism and Christianity is the argument from bad design...
I had some very nasty choking experiences and they even grew up into fear of choking. I had fear when eating my food. I overcame my fears, but in the end I'm a biologist... It seems that we really are so badly designed that we just can't had been created by a loving God.
What do you think?
Svetoslav Alexandrov
B.Sc. in Molecular biology
M.Sc. in Plant physiology
B.Sc. in Molecular biology
M.Sc. in Plant physiology
- jlay
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 3613
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:47 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Young-Earth Creationist
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
If you are a biologist how about posing an intelligent hyposthesis?
-“The Bible treated allegorically becomes putty in the hands of the exegete.” John Walvoord
"I'm not saying scientists don't overstate their results. They do. And it's understandable, too...If you spend years working toward a certain goal and make no progress, of course you are going to spin your results in a positive light." Ivellious
"I'm not saying scientists don't overstate their results. They do. And it's understandable, too...If you spend years working toward a certain goal and make no progress, of course you are going to spin your results in a positive light." Ivellious
- Canuckster1127
- Old School
- Posts: 5310
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:31 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
Badly designed in comparison with what?
Dogmatism is the comfortable intellectual framework of self-righteousness. Self-righteousness is more decadent than the worst sexual sin. ~ Dan Allender
- Zvezdichko
- Acquainted Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:25 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
.. with a hypothetically better design that includes two separate tubes, for exampleCanuckster1127 wrote:Badly designed in comparison with what?
Svetoslav Alexandrov
B.Sc. in Molecular biology
M.Sc. in Plant physiology
B.Sc. in Molecular biology
M.Sc. in Plant physiology
-
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:01 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Aussie Land
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
God said his creation was good not perfect, it was never meant to be perfect, if it was perfect we would live forever. Genesis 1:10
This goes the same for design, it is good not perfect.
Dan
This goes the same for design, it is good not perfect.
Dan
1Tim1:15-17
Here is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance: Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners of whom I am the worst. But for that very reason I was shown mercy so that in me, the worst of sinners, Christ Jesus might display his immense patience as an example for those who would believe in him and receive eternal life. Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever.Amen.
Here is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance: Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners of whom I am the worst. But for that very reason I was shown mercy so that in me, the worst of sinners, Christ Jesus might display his immense patience as an example for those who would believe in him and receive eternal life. Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever.Amen.
- Zvezdichko
- Acquainted Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:25 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
Why would a God create a creation that's not perfect? This would prove his impotence.Danieltwotwenty wrote:God said his creation was good not perfect, it was never meant to be perfect, if it was perfect we would live forever. Genesis 1:10
This goes the same for design, it is good not perfect.
Dan
Svetoslav Alexandrov
B.Sc. in Molecular biology
M.Sc. in Plant physiology
B.Sc. in Molecular biology
M.Sc. in Plant physiology
-
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:01 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Aussie Land
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
Zvezdichko wrote:Why would a God create a creation that's not perfect? This would prove his impotence.Danieltwotwenty wrote:God said his creation was good not perfect, it was never meant to be perfect, if it was perfect we would live forever. Genesis 1:10
This goes the same for design, it is good not perfect.
Dan
If the creation was perfect we would not die and would have no need to seek God, God seeks a relationship with us and wants us to make a choice and has provided a system that was designed in such a way that we could freely make that choice.
God is not incompetent, he created it this way with a larger purpose in mind.
Death is not the end (don't fear the reaper), the perfect creation is the next life once you have made your choice.
Dan
1Tim1:15-17
Here is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance: Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners of whom I am the worst. But for that very reason I was shown mercy so that in me, the worst of sinners, Christ Jesus might display his immense patience as an example for those who would believe in him and receive eternal life. Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever.Amen.
Here is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance: Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners of whom I am the worst. But for that very reason I was shown mercy so that in me, the worst of sinners, Christ Jesus might display his immense patience as an example for those who would believe in him and receive eternal life. Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever.Amen.
- Silvertusk
- Board Moderator
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:38 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Undecided
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
Anyway - how do we know it is a bad design - we are discovering new things about the human body all the time. Did your university teach you all the knowledge of human biology discovered and undiscovered?
- RickD
- Make me a Sammich Member
- Posts: 22063
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:59 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: Kitchen
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
God's next creation will be perfect.Zvezdichko wrote:Why would a God create a creation that's not perfect? This would prove his impotence.Danieltwotwenty wrote:God said his creation was good not perfect, it was never meant to be perfect, if it was perfect we would live forever. Genesis 1:10
This goes the same for design, it is good not perfect.
Dan
Maybe, you'd like to join us, Zvezdichko.Isaiah 65:17 "Behold, I will create new heavens and a new earth. The former things will not be remembered, nor will they come to mind.
John 5:24
24 “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.
“A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.”
-Edward R Murrow
St. Richard the Sarcastic--The Patron Saint of Irony
24 “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.
“A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.”
-Edward R Murrow
St. Richard the Sarcastic--The Patron Saint of Irony
- wrain62
- Valued Member
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:09 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
God is not here for our happiness. This goes along with saying that the existence of disease and natural disaster is in conflict with God's loving nature or extreme power.
Romans 12:17 Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everybody.
- Zvezdichko
- Acquainted Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:25 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
That's very interesting and at the same time disturbing. To me it seems that God has created a harsh and malevolent world (system) in which there will be two types of people: 1. The ones who will feel helpless in this malevolent world and seek God. 2. The others who will think that God doesn't exist, the bad design is actually created by evolution or (if theism is true) by an evil entity ... and they will have nothing to do with this evil entity...If the creation was perfect we would not die and would have no need to seek God, God seeks a relationship with us and wants us to make a choice and has provided a system that was designed in such a way that we could freely make that choice.
To me it reminds me of the movie Coraline in which the girl is actually being forced to love her other mother... It's not really a choice... And by the way we're arguing about theism and yes - theoretically your point has some merit if the world was created by a neutral deity / or a moral monster... But when it comes to Christianity this problem is really a brick in the wall, because we are dealing with LOVE.
The question still stays: If God is love, who would he created a malevolent world in which we're forced to make a very nasty choice? It's not something LOVE could do becuase LOVE cannot do and shouldn't create malevolent/harsh things...
We know that it's a bad design when people suffer... The criteria is: suffering or no suffering. Suffering implies bad design. Lack of suffering implies good design. My university didn't teach me all the knowledge of human body, but it taught me so many things I'm wondering how the world could have been created by a loving deity. Predators. Death. Viruses...Anyway - how do we know it is a bad design - we are discovering new things about the human body all the time. Did your university teach you all the knowledge of human biology discovered and undiscovered?
There's a disturbing trend amongst many Christians who love to downgrade the omnipotence of God. Why create a temporary world before perfect world is still a question (check point 1. of my reply), especially if the temporary world is malevolent and harsh.God's next creation will be perfect.
Perhaps. But don't tell me that those who don't join you will go to a fiery pit called hell... This not only cannot be reconciled with love, but I find it insulting. I think that Christian Universalism explains much better the full restoration of the world, but we still deal with the problem of evil. I'm not open to contradictions in religion, and I'll never ever be.Maybe, you'd like to join us, Zvezdichko.
Yes, we really have the very same problem, but if God is not here for our happiness why is he here? If I create something I love dearly, I would try to create the best conditions for my creation. I would want my creation to feel better at all cost.God is not here for our happiness. This goes along with saying that the existence of disease and natural disaster is in conflict with God's loving nature or extreme power.
The only other option is that God doesn't care about happiness because he's neutral or totally evil.
Svetoslav Alexandrov
B.Sc. in Molecular biology
M.Sc. in Plant physiology
B.Sc. in Molecular biology
M.Sc. in Plant physiology
- neo-x
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 3551
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:13 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Contact:
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
Zvez,
First, I would like to say that an argument from a "very, very bad design", never proves anything. To you a design may seem bad, really bad, like I don't like the design of the new Nokia N9. I prefer others but does that make it a bad design just because it doesn't work for me. I mean, I can argue that 2 legs is a bad design because you and I can't run as fast as a horse. Would you find that a legitimate argument? Even if you do, it is not. Because we are weighing the argument against nothing but our perception of a supposedly better design. Would you agree if a person breaks his leg while climbing a tree and then complain that God made a very bad design cuz if he had made man with no legs at all, his leg won't be broken??? This is just circular perception bent on proving itself.
I hope you can see the point.
First, I would like to say that an argument from a "very, very bad design", never proves anything. To you a design may seem bad, really bad, like I don't like the design of the new Nokia N9. I prefer others but does that make it a bad design just because it doesn't work for me. I mean, I can argue that 2 legs is a bad design because you and I can't run as fast as a horse. Would you find that a legitimate argument? Even if you do, it is not. Because we are weighing the argument against nothing but our perception of a supposedly better design. Would you agree if a person breaks his leg while climbing a tree and then complain that God made a very bad design cuz if he had made man with no legs at all, his leg won't be broken??? This is just circular perception bent on proving itself.
Ah, not being fair Zev, this whole statement begs the question. God made a free world. It turned malevolent because God just so happened to give man, you and me, free will as well. Ah there you go, you can do what you like, help or kill, feed or starve, up to you. The choices that you do make on your own, is also the result of that same God. Should your choices not be free? Now when they are, you are complaining, if it had been robotic, automated, you wouldn't even know that you could complain. Or do you like a God who can program everyone to be just good and then shove religion, down your throat, and all you do, in all your life, is just praising God, on your knees, not because you love him. No, but because you can't do anything else. Your choice is not involved and you have no say in the matter. Well believe me, that would be evil. So really, what are the odds that God is not loving? he is loving Zev, you're very existance proves it. Had he been really evil, you would have been eliminated the very moment you said he is not loving. After all, if he is really evil, then why spare you?The question still stays: If God is love, who would he created a malevolent world in which we're forced to make a very nasty choice? It's not something LOVE could do becuase LOVE cannot do and shouldn't create malevolent/harsh things...
I hope you can see the point.
It would be a blessing if they missed the cairns and got lost on the way back. Or if
the Thing on the ice got them tonight.
I could only turn and stare in horror at the chief surgeon.
Death by starvation is a terrible thing, Goodsir, continued Stanley.
And with that we went below to the flame-flickering Darkness of the lower deck
and to a cold almost the equal of the Dante-esque Ninth Circle Arctic Night
without.
//johnadavid.wordpress.com
the Thing on the ice got them tonight.
I could only turn and stare in horror at the chief surgeon.
Death by starvation is a terrible thing, Goodsir, continued Stanley.
And with that we went below to the flame-flickering Darkness of the lower deck
and to a cold almost the equal of the Dante-esque Ninth Circle Arctic Night
without.
//johnadavid.wordpress.com
- Zvezdichko
- Acquainted Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:25 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
Greetings,neo-x wrote:Zvez,
First, I would like to say that an argument from a "very, very bad design", never proves anything. To you a design may seem bad, really bad, like I don't like the design of the new Nokia N9. I prefer others but does that make it a bad design just because it doesn't work for me. I mean, I can argue that 2 legs is a bad design because you and I can't run as fast as a horse. Would you find that a legitimate argument? Even if you do, it is not. Because we are weighing the argument against nothing but our perception of a supposedly better design. Would you agree if a person breaks his leg while climbing a tree and then complain that God made a very bad design cuz if he had made man with no legs at all, his leg won't be broken??? This is just circular perception bent on proving itself.
I think that there's a difference in the viewpoint towards this problem. You're trying to solve the problem top-down, while I'm looking bottom-up.
The argument "very bad design" actually proves something, but only if you can offer a hypothetical better design. If somebody offers a plausible hypothesis that works - like the case with two tubes instead of esophagus - you're able to prove that there's a better available design... Richard Deem may think this design is "ugly" as described on GodAndScience website, but his argument falls short because ugliness is relative and not abolute - if everyone had been created with two tubes - one for breathing and one for food, we wouldn't have thought it's ugly because we wouldn't have imagine it could have been otherwise.
Breakfast time... will reply to the second part of the comment later.
Svetoslav Alexandrov
B.Sc. in Molecular biology
M.Sc. in Plant physiology
B.Sc. in Molecular biology
M.Sc. in Plant physiology
- Zvezdichko
- Acquainted Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:25 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
Back hereneo-x wrote: Ah, not being fair Zev, this whole statement begs the question. God made a free world. It turned malevolent because God just so happened to give man, you and me, free will as well. Ah there you go, you can do what you like, help or kill, feed or starve, up to you. The choices that you do make on your own, is also the result of that same God. Should your choices not be free? Now when they are, you are complaining, if it had been robotic, automated, you wouldn't even know that you could complain. Or do you like a God who can program everyone to be just good and then shove religion, down your throat, and all you do, in all your life, is just praising God, on your knees, not because you love him. No, but because you can't do anything else. Your choice is not involved and you have no say in the matter. Well believe me, that would be evil. So really, what are the odds that God is not loving? he is loving Zev, you're very existance proves it. Had he been really evil, you would have been eliminated the very moment you said he is not loving. After all, if he is really evil, then why spare you?
he is loving Zev, you're very existance proves it. Had he been really evil, you would have been eliminated the very moment you said he is not loving. After all, if he is really evil, then why spare you?
I remember reading an article... If he's really evil, why would he spare me? It's possible if he wants me to watch me suffering and he experiences pleasure of doing this
Ah, I remember the link to the article:
http://www.dpjs.co.uk/god.html
If God is evil, there could still be love and good people in this malevolent world, so the evil God could experience pleasure by punishing good people...
Svetoslav Alexandrov
B.Sc. in Molecular biology
M.Sc. in Plant physiology
B.Sc. in Molecular biology
M.Sc. in Plant physiology
- neo-x
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 3551
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:13 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Contact:
Re: Argument from bad design. Very, very bad design!
Yes, but it makes the point even more irrelevant. If God is really evil, then the whole point is, you do not matter to him in the least and the foremost. If that be true then what you see and suffer would not even matter to him.I remember reading an article... If he's really evil, why would he spare me? It's possible if he wants me to watch me suffering and he experiences pleasure of doing this
It would be a blessing if they missed the cairns and got lost on the way back. Or if
the Thing on the ice got them tonight.
I could only turn and stare in horror at the chief surgeon.
Death by starvation is a terrible thing, Goodsir, continued Stanley.
And with that we went below to the flame-flickering Darkness of the lower deck
and to a cold almost the equal of the Dante-esque Ninth Circle Arctic Night
without.
//johnadavid.wordpress.com
the Thing on the ice got them tonight.
I could only turn and stare in horror at the chief surgeon.
Death by starvation is a terrible thing, Goodsir, continued Stanley.
And with that we went below to the flame-flickering Darkness of the lower deck
and to a cold almost the equal of the Dante-esque Ninth Circle Arctic Night
without.
//johnadavid.wordpress.com