hamilrob wrote:OK HMG. I hear you. You must be special. I am glad you checked yourself out though. I would continue to do that. I have had experiences myself that I wasn't so quick to conclude were from God.
One question I have is if you got that much of a graphic experience, then why can't I get the same? Why should you expect me to be as convinced as you? I don't know you. You could be a charlatan or a trickster. A little bit of skepticism goes a long way.
Interesting questions. You are right that HelpMeGod's experiences might not be the best proof of Christianity. There is plenty of other evidence, however. Experience is
not the only source of knowledge.
hamilrob wrote:I believe there is much to be understood about the human body and brain. We are still evolving. You say your mind is not playing tricks on you, but what if your mind is operating in a normal fashion, exposing you to experiences beryond your intellectual ability to explain?
What if all of our minds are playing tricks on us, if we are all completely insane? A brain with a naturalistic origin would have a high probability of being like this. But oops, I used my own brain to make that conclusion. Therefore, we have a self-defeating proposition. Therefore the idea that the brain has a naturalistic origin is self-defeating.
Trustworthy intelligence can only exist in two scenarios:
1.) It was designed. (a.k.a. our brains)
2.) It always existed. (a.k.a. God)
If you can think of a third option, be sure to let me know.
In short, if a brain has a naturalistic origin, it cannot establish the conclusion that it has a naturalistic origin.
hamilrob wrote:I still say there are answers, and the God answer inhibits us from learning more about ourselves as humans.
What if the God answer is the
correct answer? You must admit it is at least logically possible. Oops, I forgot you don't like logic.
hamilrob wrote:If God sees no reason to show me what he showed you, then He would have to understand my reluctance to piggy back on your experiences. Too many people get taken for their life savings following people who make incredible claims about their contacts with God. It happens every hour of every day. people are by and large gullible like that.
Naturally. People can lie, so one testimony isn't proof of anything until the validity of the testimony is established.
hamilrob wrote:Anybody that would believe a man rose from the dead bodily has to be permeable.
No, not actually. If a theistic God exists, then that theistic God can do anything which is logically possible, even if it contradicts normal physics.
Anyone who would believe this
without evidence would be "permeable".
hamilrob wrote:Religion requires a bit of gullibility because not everyone gets nailed in the head as you were. Many folkis just take it in because they are conditioned to believe things.
Genetic fallacy, pure and simple.
hamilrob wrote:So until I get what you got, don't blame me for remaining skeptical, and don't exspect your testimony to change me. I have heard much of what you said before. People hear voices and see things all the time. There are reasons... answers of an empirical nature.
Sometimes there are naturalistic explanations. However, we shouldn't make the hasty generalization that these always exist. This would be irrational.
Look for other evidence. You claim to have read C.S. Lewis, so you should understand at least basically what I am talking about.