Neo wrote:
But you alao have the same chemical reactions and I have the same too. The only difference is we call love a divine emotion and they call it a biological chemical process. The end result is the same.
Neo,
What?
In an atheistic/naturalistic worldview, love can only be something physical. In that worldview, there's no basis for love to have any
real meaning. Of course love still is love no matter what, because in reality, God does exist.
Neo wrote:
I can understand why in the Christian frame you see love more than just a chemical reaction but it is important to realize that the emotion is the one with value, not the process. On that account it is unfair to say to an atheist that hia life has no meaning when he sincerely doesn't agree with you.
I think you're misunderstanding me Neo. Love is not a chemical reaction. But in an atheistic/naturalistic worldview, love can't be anything but physical. Because the spiritual, specifically a God who is Love, doesn't exist. I'm not telling an atheist that his life has no meaning, because God DOES EXIST in reality. I'm just saying in that worldview, there's no
basis for life to have any real meaning.