That's not clarifying, that's changing what you wrote. You said it was a fact that aliens don't exist. Now you say they may or may not exist. If you're sticking with this, then I agree.Neo backtracked wrote:
Let me clarify a bit...aliens may exist they may not...
Of course it's a faulty assertion. You asserted that it's a fact that aliens don't exist. It's not a fact. Even if it's true that there's no evidence that aliens exist, it's still not a fact that they don't exist. It would just be a fact that there's no evidence of their existence.And generally speaking, its not a faulty assertion per se. No one knows of any evidence that aliens exist. Its a fact that we don't have evidence which concludes to anything. And None of the said evidence can be confirmed. While absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, there is also a rational understanding and probability. I can easily say there are aliens living at the core of the earth, and then apply to mystery here. Your own reasoning would not be able to find fault with this. See absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Or I can say that evolution is true and you can say there is no evidence for it and I can simply say absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
My concern isn't whether aliens exist. I don't know, and I really don't care. My concern is with you calling something a fact when it's clearly not a fact.I understand your concern here but something are quite absurd and I find it one of those things. There is a point where appealing to mystery does not help. Show me evidence that aliens exist and I will happily concede.
Just like nobody can declare it a fact that God doesn't exist, nobody can call it a fact that aliens don't exist.