Talking about people not present as a metagory for positions not held by persons who are presentFurstentum Liechtenstein wrote:No, "she" isn't right; "she's" just being an idiot. "Her" idiocy is likely rooted in pride, like this guy:Audie wrote:I dont really think the denial and negligence involved is in fact a bit less extreme.I know that is not a popular statement with those who hold to yec belief, but, you or others might like to give at least a moments consideration, be given pause if only so little, maybe, she is right?
I used to have a certain acquaintance about 10 years ago. He was gay, and he and his husband travelled a lot. I don't remember his name, but I'll call him Joe. Anyway, Joe was also an anti-semite but he hid it by saying that he was anti-zionist. He decried Israel with all the usual baloney such people puke up. I answered him that he could walk hand-in-hand with his husband in Tel Aviv and no one would bat an eyelash but if he tried that in Amman, Jordan, (or any Arab city outside Israel) he and his husband would come back in a box, assuming the bodies were ever found. He didn't like my answer but he knew it was true.
...Now, if "she" thinks YECs and jihadis are equally extreme, then "she" is an even bigger idiot than Joe!
FL
may seem hilarious to, ah, "him", but its actually kinda lame.
I compared the level of denial and negligence of someone who believes in yec to one who believes things like vast Jewish conspiracy to do 911 etc.