I disagree with that moral relative statement, that's why I am stating my disagreement. Unless you are a moral relativist, why are you making a statement defending moral relativism?Mallz wrote:Guess what the underlined is? A statement defending moral relativism as reality based off of belief and behavior. Again, context.
So why did you make that statement defending moral relativism that contradicts this?Mallz wrote:If you understood this passage you would have read it to say:
'I knew wrong when I found out wrong but didn't know I was doing wrong until I found out it was wrong'.
This passage was a foundational point (during my first post) as to our discussion with morality.
It shows two things. One, right and wrong exist. Two, humanity didn't know they were doing things that were wrong until it was shown to them by a standard higher than them. This shows people do wrong knowingly and unknowingly.
I looked over our replies. 5/28 12;25am you answered my question the first time, but you made a mistake using the quote function and made it appear as if the first part of your reply (where you answered my question) was actually a part of the question I asked, then the second part of your question looked like it was the only answer you gave, so at first glance it looked like you neglected to answer the question, thus I asked it again.Mallz wrote:Now I answered this question twice in our conversation. Twice, Kenny.
That was my mistake, but it isn’t like I don't listen to you, it’s just when mistakes using the quote function are made, misunderstandings like those are bound to happen.
Now if you agree you make mistakes and sin, why did you say those who go against their religion don't believe and accept what their religion says? What did you mean by this? Are you saying to sin is a part of Christianity?
Ken