Kenny wrote:I didn’t say that; I said weather the killing is murder or not is subjective. If the person killed is innocent it’s murder; if he is guilty it is not murderSquible wrote:Kenny,
Your response demonstrates that either you fail to understand what I wrote or perhaps you are trying to side step answering it directly because you didn't like the conclusion.
The reasons for someone committing murder are by definition subjective Kenny,
Of course it is wrong! I’ve never suggested it was anything other than! But it is subjectively wrong; not objectively wrong. You seem to be under this impression (like many others here) that subjective morality is equal to no morality at all; that the only way morality counts is if it were objective.Squible wrote:whether murder is right or wrong is a different thing all together.
Now I was making the point that if certain actions are right or wrong regardless of what others think then objective morality exists.
Answer the question directly and to use something you did a few posts back:
Is murdering someone due to their skin colour wrong regardless of what other people think?
Yes or No.
Now that I’ve answered your question; please answer mine. Is lying to the SS wrong?
Ken
Crimes against the state, waging war against the state, etc. Legally Soldiers killed in battle are not considered murdered. Legally a person receiving the death penalty after trial is not considered murdered.Nicki wrote:What would someone killed by someone else have to be guilty of for it not to be murder?
[/quote]Nicki wrote:I think your firm beliefs about murder and your mention of a 'moral obligation' to mislead the SS really speak of a concrete, factual morality, which is independent of what some people might think.
But this only applies to me and those who agree with me on this particular issue; it doesn't apply to anybody else. In order for it to be factual and objective it would have to apply to everybody else also
Ken