typo-pickin' on is the lowest.RickD wrote:Speaking of English words, maybe you wanna start using them, instead of this gibberish you're speaking.Audie wrote:And English wordd are open to grest abuse thro' the vice of equivocation.
"Grest"?????
What is an "evolutionist"?
-
Audie
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 3502
- Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:41 am
- Christian: No
- Sex: Female
- Creation Position: I don't believe in creation
- Location: USA
Re: What is an "evolutionist"?
-
RickD
- Make me a Sammich Member
- Posts: 22063
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:59 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: Kitchen
Re: What is an "evolutionist"?
Not spell-checking before hitting the submit button is even lower than typo-pickin'.Audie wrote:typo-pickin' on is the lowest.RickD wrote:Speaking of English words, maybe you wanna start using them, instead of this gibberish you're speaking.Audie wrote:And English wordd are open to grest abuse thro' the vice of equivocation.
"Grest"?????
John 5:24
24 “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.
“A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.”
-Edward R Murrow
St. Richard the Sarcastic--The Patron Saint of Irony
24 “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.
“A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.”
-Edward R Murrow
St. Richard the Sarcastic--The Patron Saint of Irony
-
Audie
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 3502
- Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:41 am
- Christian: No
- Sex: Female
- Creation Position: I don't believe in creation
- Location: USA
Re: What is an "evolutionist"?
Rats. Busted again.RickD wrote:Not spell-checking before hitting the submit button is even lower than typo-pickin'.Audie wrote:typo-pickin' on is the lowest.RickD wrote:Speaking of English words, maybe you wanna start using them, instead of this gibberish you're speaking.Audie wrote:And English wordd are open to grest abuse thro' the vice of equivocation.
"Grest"?????
-
crochet1949
- Esteemed Senior Member
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 1:04 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Female
- Creation Position: Young-Earth Creationist
Re: What is an "evolutionist"?
RickD -- Great Interpretation of my thoughts. Actually, I think that Audie simply hit the 's' instead of the 'a' by mistake since they are right next to each other on the keyboard. Well, and then the 'd' instead of 's'. It's innovative spelling.
Considering we've been talking about the Bible / God / creation / I Thought you might have been asking a Serious question about God. The usage of 'our' is very important.
Translators put the Bible into the English language so that no one would have to rely on religious hierarchy To interpret from the Latin And the fact that back then, the common people usually were illiterate and Had to rely on the educated priests to read. And Sometimes those priests had their own agendas. They Knew the Scriptures and sometimes added to or subtracted From and misled the people. But a monk who Did read and realized what was happening within the church -- tried to reform the church from within. Didn't go over very well. Martin Luther.
This is to say that English, Latin, Hebrew -- There is but One God -- Not three different Gods' and we / the 'common' people Can read Scripture for ourselves. If a person Wants to believe in three separate 'gods' then that's their business. But the rest of Scripture doesn't jibe with that. And certainly there have always been other 'gods' worshipped. But there is only One True God.
Enough theology for now? One little comment by yourself results in a sermon from me.
Considering we've been talking about the Bible / God / creation / I Thought you might have been asking a Serious question about God. The usage of 'our' is very important.
Translators put the Bible into the English language so that no one would have to rely on religious hierarchy To interpret from the Latin And the fact that back then, the common people usually were illiterate and Had to rely on the educated priests to read. And Sometimes those priests had their own agendas. They Knew the Scriptures and sometimes added to or subtracted From and misled the people. But a monk who Did read and realized what was happening within the church -- tried to reform the church from within. Didn't go over very well. Martin Luther.
This is to say that English, Latin, Hebrew -- There is but One God -- Not three different Gods' and we / the 'common' people Can read Scripture for ourselves. If a person Wants to believe in three separate 'gods' then that's their business. But the rest of Scripture doesn't jibe with that. And certainly there have always been other 'gods' worshipped. But there is only One True God.
Enough theology for now? One little comment by yourself results in a sermon from me.