Rick you are aware that you posted the links so subsequent credibility actually lies with you. But as you stated you have no knowledge of her background, but yet you quoted her as a credible source. I hope you see how this in no way discredits my assertions but your own. All good, I have done the research for you.RickD wrote:Mel,melanie wrote:Rick this isn't an article with any verifiable truth.RickD wrote:Apparently the current vetting process doesn't work. At least here in the US.
http://www.allenbwest.com/michellejesse ... t-they-did
This entirely proves my point. This is not a newsworthy source written by a impartial investigative journalist. You have cited a right wing crackpot devoid of any actual factual info.
Anybody can post a link to whatever persuasion. Unfortunately the onus now lies with us to know our sources as trustworthy, impartial sources.
The links brought me to the Young Conservatives web page.
This is not verifiable news sources!!!
May I say again, this is entirely my point.
When we are taking our 'knowledge' from such sources then how can our 'cred' not be in question!!!!!!
I'm guessing you wouldn't make such a strong statement as, "a right wing crackpot" if you didn't have evidence to back that up. Since I'm not familiar with Michelle Jesse, the author, please tell me why she's a right wing crackpot. Any links that show that would be helpful.
Keeping in mind this was an article by Michelle Jesse but posted on a webpage generated by Allen B West.
Who is cited as being the scrounge of the far left, a conservative icon, and a longstanding conservative spokesmen.
Biased info generated by a biased webpage.
Any links that support otherwise are welcomed