Oh kateliz you are over-reacting, it was not a generalization.
kateliz wrote:BGood wrote:I assume you think homosexuality is immoral. But let me ask you, would it be ok to drag a homosexual man through the streets and then beat him till he has to be hospitalized.
The problem is that people will exhibit anger to the individual and not the act. This is where liberals come in as ask, is this not hypocracy to dehumanize certain individuals?
Hmm. Coming to see your point. After all, it
was hypocritical of me to beat that lesbian I met after telling her God loves her and wants her to repent so He can forgive her. The liberal standing nearby
was right about
that! Guess I was wrong; I'm sorry. Maybe I should just go back to loudly crying out how they're going to hell, like I was doing before that incident. At least that would be Christian and nonhypocritical of me.
My point, BGood, is that you came on too strong and were unreasonable. Do you honestly believe I'd do somthing like that just because I'm obviously not a liberal? Are all conservatives really going to put all homosexuals in the hospital?
Cause I mean, we all know homosexuals are really variations of that one frog that can change it's gender; they aren't human at all- and I believe we should start using them for disection in school science classes.
Your generalizations are, frankly, ubsurd. I hope you can see that now!
I am not saying that, what I am saying is that there should be laws affording people protection, and basic human rights. You cannot deny that there is descrimination occuring. There are laws against rape, this does not assume that all men are sexual predators who cannot be controlled.
Re-read the paragraph again the first statement is a rhetorical statement of an extreme, and then I go on to say that lesser forms of dehumanization occurs.
BGood wrote:I assume you think homosexuality is immoral. But let me ask you, would it be ok to drag a homosexual man through the streets and then beat him till he has to be hospitalized.
Rhetorical question, obvious answer is no.
The problem is that people will exhibit anger to the individual and not the act. This is where liberals come in as ask, is this not hypocracy to dehumanize certain individuals?
For many it is hard to get past the action to the human being underneath. Even though dragging men through the streets is obviously wrong, many a times they are treated without respect nor dignity. Which is also wrong.
It is not length of life, but depth of life. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
)
