That is your inference driven by your presuppositions...Kurieuo wrote: It is clear that McMullin sees Hillary as a lesser evil, his attacks are always pointed at Trump, and as Rick quoted his words are to do with blocking Trump. He wants Hillary in office more than Trump.
But McMullin's stated position is that he wants to block both Clinton and Trump
The 12th Ammendment says that the House keeps voting on the top 3 electoral vote getters until someone gets a majority.Second, if you really think McMullin will block both, please tell me what then happens in the election? It's only a block if either are prevented from getting in. Yet, trust me, one WILL still get in.
The question then becomes what will the "never Trump" Republicans in the House do?
Would they give in to Republican pressure and give Trump the win?
Would some of them join the Democrats to give Hillary the Win?
Would the Never Trumpers and the Democrats compromise and agree to give McMullin the win?
I don't know... this is uncharted territory... if it happens... which is unlikely... because Trump probably needs to win Pennsylvania to keep Clinton from winning outright... which is unlikely to happen anyway
At the moment the bar has already been set very low by Clinton and Trump.In any case, McMullin's cards are clear, and I don't see he would be a good president either.
It wouldn't take much at all to be a better president then either Clinton or Trump IMHO.
And at least we'd get a real Conservative.