Of course I saw the bold part. It still doesn't mean man wrote the Bible, not inspired by God.Stu wrote:I was talking about what bippy said which equals that man wrote the Bible and not God. Did you see the bold part.RickD wrote:The young earth/global flood INTERPRETATION, isn't equal to Scripture. It's an interpretation of scripture, by man.Stu wrote:So the Bible isn't inspired by God? It is the work of man?bippy123 wrote:Why couldn't it be a regional flood ? I mean that is supported by the different cultures of that time talking about a regional flood taking place , plus to the ancient people of those times that region was basically the whole world .
Makes sense doesn't it ?
Surely you're not so narrow-minded and dogmatic, that you can't understand the difference?
You seem intelligent. Why don't you understand that concept? It's not rocket surgery.
Perhaps we should wait to see what he meant and not interpret for him
It's simply a different interpretation than your "equal to scripture" young earth/entire earth flood interpretation.