This area is for friendly discussions only. Post in a more relaxed setting without fear of being attacked. No sensitive topics allowed and strictly no debating!
Yep - we'll always have climate change. And we DO need to clean up our systems' output and pollutants. But IS the data used to drive the global warming / sky is falling / globalists' carbon-tax solutions, etc. rhetoric perhaps immensely problematic? I'd say so!
READ! And tell me what you think?
Article Outtake: "This report, by meteorologist Anthony Watts, presents the results of the first-ever comprehensive review of the quality of data coming from the National Weather Service’s network of temperature stations. Watts and a team of volunteers visually inspected and took pictures of more than 850 of these stations. What they found will shock you."
Data that is accurately gathered doesn't lie. While it can be used dishonestly, the study clearly indicates a problem with the systems in place to record local temperature records - particularly their placements, proximities, and construction. Another inconvenient fact, I suppose. Facts will never deter those determined to believe whatever their pre-conceived notions are driving.
