I Think God Is A Scientist
-
- Newbie Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:35 am
- Christian: No
- Location: Virginia, USA
I Think God Is A Scientist
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am, by my standards of course, a normal person. I wrote a little poem a couple of years back called " I Think God Is A Scientist". I wrote this poem from my heart. I have been raised christian, I went to church for as long as I can remember Three times a week. I truly believe in a supreme being however there have been many questions growing in my mind since I was a little girl. I remember camping in the desert with my parents many years ago, and seeing things in the sky that I don't believe any one could explain logically to me. That is when I became more of a scientist in nature. I truly believe that there is some greater being out there responsible for creating all that we are and I wish that some one could truly explain how we became. Yet to this day nobody can make sense to me about how life began. The bible has many contradictions in itself, that the scientist in me can not accept. That is where evolution steps in with me. Our scientist today have grown much since the 1800's, I am sure that if you told them that you could clone an animal or a vegetable or even a human you would have been laughed out of the water. But now this is a reality. In cosmic standards we, humans, have occupied this universe for such a short time. I see humanity as an experiment. Or why else would God destroy everything when things went terribly wrong? I see the things here on earth as a great collection of things, perhaps a collection of the most loved and adored creatures, created for us to survive. On the other hand we could have been a continuation of something lost or dying. I find it hard to believe that all things were just a random act of evolution. I am sure you can see why I believe that God is a scientist. A scientist watches over his creations and if something doesnt work then they erase it and start over. God and science are tied together in me and I don't know why there is such a big fight over it, I accept creation and evolution, all things had to be created, and then they evolve into something greater. God is the ultimate creator and a scientist creates. Perhaps his science is evolved way beyond what we can comprehend, thus it is explained as miraculas.
I truly wish some one could explain why creationism and evolution have to be separated, I feel they work together hand in hand. You need one for the other to work.
"I Think God Is A Scientist
I thank him I do for making me like this
Yep, no complaints here
In fact none in several years
I can imagine him there
Mixing things together
Creating all things
From snowflakes to feathers
Almighty is he who creates galaxies
For to turn darkness into dust
Is more than I can percieve
It takes a scientific mind and a good recipe
I wonder perhaps if I am still under warranty"
I am, by my standards of course, a normal person. I wrote a little poem a couple of years back called " I Think God Is A Scientist". I wrote this poem from my heart. I have been raised christian, I went to church for as long as I can remember Three times a week. I truly believe in a supreme being however there have been many questions growing in my mind since I was a little girl. I remember camping in the desert with my parents many years ago, and seeing things in the sky that I don't believe any one could explain logically to me. That is when I became more of a scientist in nature. I truly believe that there is some greater being out there responsible for creating all that we are and I wish that some one could truly explain how we became. Yet to this day nobody can make sense to me about how life began. The bible has many contradictions in itself, that the scientist in me can not accept. That is where evolution steps in with me. Our scientist today have grown much since the 1800's, I am sure that if you told them that you could clone an animal or a vegetable or even a human you would have been laughed out of the water. But now this is a reality. In cosmic standards we, humans, have occupied this universe for such a short time. I see humanity as an experiment. Or why else would God destroy everything when things went terribly wrong? I see the things here on earth as a great collection of things, perhaps a collection of the most loved and adored creatures, created for us to survive. On the other hand we could have been a continuation of something lost or dying. I find it hard to believe that all things were just a random act of evolution. I am sure you can see why I believe that God is a scientist. A scientist watches over his creations and if something doesnt work then they erase it and start over. God and science are tied together in me and I don't know why there is such a big fight over it, I accept creation and evolution, all things had to be created, and then they evolve into something greater. God is the ultimate creator and a scientist creates. Perhaps his science is evolved way beyond what we can comprehend, thus it is explained as miraculas.
I truly wish some one could explain why creationism and evolution have to be separated, I feel they work together hand in hand. You need one for the other to work.
"I Think God Is A Scientist
I thank him I do for making me like this
Yep, no complaints here
In fact none in several years
I can imagine him there
Mixing things together
Creating all things
From snowflakes to feathers
Almighty is he who creates galaxies
For to turn darkness into dust
Is more than I can percieve
It takes a scientific mind and a good recipe
I wonder perhaps if I am still under warranty"
- AttentionKMartShoppers
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 2163
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:37 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Location: Austin, Texas
- Contact:
Same old, same old...no it doesn't.The bible has many contradictions in itself, that the scientist in me can not accept
"My actions prove that God takes care of idiots."
He occasionally stumbled over the truth, but hastily picked himself up and hurried on as if nothing had happened.
- On Stanley Baldwin
-Winston Churchill
An atheist can't find God for the same reason a criminal can't find a police officer.
You need to start asking out girls so that you can get used to the rejections.
-Anonymous
He occasionally stumbled over the truth, but hastily picked himself up and hurried on as if nothing had happened.
- On Stanley Baldwin
-Winston Churchill
An atheist can't find God for the same reason a criminal can't find a police officer.
You need to start asking out girls so that you can get used to the rejections.
-Anonymous
-
- Familiar Member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:06 am
A snowflake is actually an excellent reference. It is a beautiful, symmetrical, unique, structured coming together of random matter dependant on nothing but the random properties of the universe.
Meaningful arrangements being produced from chaos.
Also, if Jehovah were a scientist and created us in his image, he would've given us scientific evidence of his existence, since no good scientist takes the nature of the universe on faith.
Science is built on doubt, on disproving bad theories. Not faith.
Meaningful arrangements being produced from chaos.
Also, if Jehovah were a scientist and created us in his image, he would've given us scientific evidence of his existence, since no good scientist takes the nature of the universe on faith.
Science is built on doubt, on disproving bad theories. Not faith.
- August
- Old School
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 7:22 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Science is most definitely built on faith.Resident Atheist wrote:Science is built on doubt, on disproving bad theories. Not faith.
Acts 17:24-25 (NIV)
"The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. [25] And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else."
//www.omnipotentgrace.org
//christianskepticism.blogspot.com
"The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. [25] And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else."
//www.omnipotentgrace.org
//christianskepticism.blogspot.com
-
- Familiar Member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:06 am
- August
- Old School
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 7:22 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Faith in the uniformity of nature, the reliability of your senses, the scientific method, the laws of logic and the truth-value of predictions. Off the top of my head.Resident Atheist wrote:In what way? Because so far as I can tell it's really just applied skepticism.
Acts 17:24-25 (NIV)
"The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. [25] And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else."
//www.omnipotentgrace.org
//christianskepticism.blogspot.com
"The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. [25] And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else."
//www.omnipotentgrace.org
//christianskepticism.blogspot.com
-
- Familiar Member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:06 am
Faith in the uniformity of nature,
<b>Nature has proven extremely uniform.</b>
the reliability of your senses,
<b>They and our minds are all we have to be scientists, would you have us doubt them and resign ourselves to know nothing?</b>
the scientific method,
<b>What has faith got to do with it? It's a series of proven methods that are extremely useful.</b>
the laws of logic
<b>As in "A cannot be A and not A" or logic in general?</b>
and the truth-value of predictions.
<b>Once again, I'm not seeing faith. Also that is not a clinching proof, it is compelling evidence.</b>
<b>Nature has proven extremely uniform.</b>
the reliability of your senses,
<b>They and our minds are all we have to be scientists, would you have us doubt them and resign ourselves to know nothing?</b>
the scientific method,
<b>What has faith got to do with it? It's a series of proven methods that are extremely useful.</b>
the laws of logic
<b>As in "A cannot be A and not A" or logic in general?</b>
and the truth-value of predictions.
<b>Once again, I'm not seeing faith. Also that is not a clinching proof, it is compelling evidence.</b>
- August
- Old School
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 7:22 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Has it? In what sense? The theory of evolution you like so much shows changes in every generation, how is that uniform? And most of those changes cannot be specifically predicted, only that there will be some change.Resident Atheist wrote:Faith in the uniformity of nature,
<b>Nature has proven extremely uniform.</b>
Are your senses 100% reliable? And how do you know what you are observing? Do you sense that you are sensing something? How do you know that your sensation of your sensation is reliable?They and our minds are all we have to be scientists, would you have us doubt them and resign ourselves to know nothing?
But you stated that it is your benchmark for truth. As mentioned elsewhere, please prove it to be true, or else admit that you are holding on to it by means of faith.What has faith got to do with it? It's a series of proven methods that are extremely useful.
What is the difference between clinching proof and compelling evidence?Once again, I'm not seeing faith. Also that is not a clinching proof, it is compelling evidence.
Please check your PM.
Acts 17:24-25 (NIV)
"The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. [25] And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else."
//www.omnipotentgrace.org
//christianskepticism.blogspot.com
"The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. [25] And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else."
//www.omnipotentgrace.org
//christianskepticism.blogspot.com
They are not produced from 'the random properties of the universe', or 'from chaos'. They are produced in strict accordance with unchanging laws. This is precisely why they occur in the same form again and again and again.Resident Atheist wrote:A snowflake is actually an excellent reference. It is a beautiful, symmetrical, unique, structured coming together of random matter dependant on nothing but the random properties of the universe.
Meaningful arrangements being produced from chaos.
This is a non sequitur.Also, if Jehovah were a scientist and created us in his image, he would've given us scientific evidence of his existence, since no good scientist takes the nature of the universe on faith.