Astronomical Evidences for the God of the Bible

Discussion about scientific issues as they relate to God and Christianity including archaeology, origins of life, the universe, intelligent design, evolution, etc.
Post Reply
Jbuza
Esteemed Senior Member
Posts: 1213
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 5:26 pm

Astronomical Evidences for the God of the Bible

Post by Jbuza »

gone
Last edited by Jbuza on Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
tyler_demerhcant
Recognized Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:42 pm

Post by tyler_demerhcant »

excellent post.

I agree fully. How does hugh ross have anything to do with this post though?

I will call apon the earth moon system again, as I feel it is a very important piece of a puzzle used to calculate the age of the earth.

Physics show that the moon is traveling further and further away from the earth at a slower and slower speed.

The numbers invovled show that the earth would have been touching the moon at one point in order for the earth to have been as old as scientists would have us believe.

So far, no strong evidence has been provided to disprove the earth moon system.
User avatar
BGoodForGoodSake
Ultimate Member
Posts: 2127
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:44 am
Christian: No
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by BGoodForGoodSake »

tyler_demerhcant wrote:excellent post.

I agree fully. How does hugh ross have anything to do with this post though?

I will call apon the earth moon system again, as I feel it is a very important piece of a puzzle used to calculate the age of the earth.

Physics show that the moon is traveling further and further away from the earth at a slower and slower speed.

The numbers invovled show that the earth would have been touching the moon at one point in order for the earth to have been as old as scientists would have us believe.

So far, no strong evidence has been provided to disprove the earth moon system.
How exactly does physics show this?
Perhaps you can show us the specific figures?

Perhaps you need to investigate this matter further, there are plenty of explanations which counter this proposition.
It is not length of life, but depth of life. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Jbuza
Esteemed Senior Member
Posts: 1213
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 5:26 pm

Post by Jbuza »

gone
Last edited by Jbuza on Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
tyler_demerhcant
Recognized Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:42 pm

Post by tyler_demerhcant »

I posted it before begood, purhaps you show me some counter arguments because I have not seen any stand up to debate.

I have resources to. I dont want to go into detail again, but I will if this post sparks some more interest on it.

Perhaps we should also discuss comet life, I have yet to research it, but it seems interesting.
User avatar
Canuckster1127
Old School
Posts: 5310
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:31 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada

Post by Canuckster1127 »

tyler_demerhcant wrote:I posted it before begood, purhaps you show me some counter arguments because I have not seen any stand up to debate.

I have resources to. I dont want to go into detail again, but I will if this post sparks some more interest on it.

Perhaps we should also discuss comet life, I have yet to research it, but it seems interesting.
Comet life is interesting. Just make sure you include recent information and developments with the Kuyper Belt. ;)
Dogmatism is the comfortable intellectual framework of self-righteousness. Self-righteousness is more decadent than the worst sexual sin. ~ Dan Allender
User avatar
BGoodForGoodSake
Ultimate Member
Posts: 2127
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:44 am
Christian: No
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by BGoodForGoodSake »

tyler_demerhcant wrote:I posted it before begood, purhaps you show me some counter arguments because I have not seen any stand up to debate.

I have resources to. I dont want to go into detail again, but I will if this post sparks some more interest on it.

Perhaps we should also discuss comet life, I have yet to research it, but it seems interesting.
You mentioned that the moon is falling away from the earth at a slower and slower speed.

What is the reasoning behind this?
It is not length of life, but depth of life. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
tyler_demerhcant
Recognized Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:42 pm

Post by tyler_demerhcant »

I reetract my statement Bgood, I do not wish to argue the earth moon system at this point. I do not have a good enough understanding of it.

you win.
User avatar
BGoodForGoodSake
Ultimate Member
Posts: 2127
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:44 am
Christian: No
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by BGoodForGoodSake »

If your intention is to study the system in more detail, then it is you who has won.
It is not length of life, but depth of life. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
tyler_demerhcant
Recognized Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:42 pm

Post by tyler_demerhcant »

How so? Because I am willing to reasearch the facts, or because i will realize the flaws.

I have read that the physics involved are outdated. i will have to reaearch it to include it, but I am far to busy right now and I am reasearching Radiometrics and processes involved.

Have you heard about the RATE project.

I would like to find some material that goes against the project if possible.
User avatar
BGoodForGoodSake
Ultimate Member
Posts: 2127
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:44 am
Christian: No
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by BGoodForGoodSake »

Because your willing to research the material.

=D
It is not length of life, but depth of life. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Post Reply