Homosexuality and Big Brothers
- Canuckster1127
- Old School
- Posts: 5310
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:31 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
Homosexuality and Big Brothers
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 88,00.html
Posted without comment.
Any thoughts or responses to the message of this article?
Posted without comment.
Any thoughts or responses to the message of this article?
Last edited by Canuckster1127 on Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dogmatism is the comfortable intellectual framework of self-righteousness. Self-righteousness is more decadent than the worst sexual sin. ~ Dan Allender
homosexuality and big brother
I read one article on this yesterday and when I read the headlines I thought they were going to conclude that having a big brother would be an envirnmental factor and therefore homosexuals are not born that way but choose that because of life factors. They chose however to conclude that this was a 'genetic' factor and therefore supports them being born that way. I think it is just more grasping at straws for a 'genetic factor'. I always like to back to twin studies. If homosexuality was genetic, then you could not have identical twins with one homosexual and one heterosexual. This happens often so since their genes are identical it must be a choice and not genetic.
Ray
Ray
- BGoodForGoodSake
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:44 am
- Christian: No
- Location: Washington D.C.
Re: homosexuality and big brother
No this is incorrect, for something to be linked to genetics the odds of something occurring with twins only needs to be significantly higher statistically than the rest of the population.ray wrote:I always like to back to twin studies. If homosexuality was genetic, then you could not have identical twins with one homosexual and one heterosexual. This happens often so since their genes are identical it must be a choice and not genetic.
Ray
This is because both genetics and environment effect the outcome. Genetic traits have been shown to lead to tendancies not exact outcomes. Only certain things like eye color are absolutely dictated by genetic factors, most traits are variable due to the environment such as breast cancer succeptibility.
So going back to a study lets say identical twins have a 25% chance of sharing a trait while fraternal twins show only 14% and normal siblings and complete strangers have a 5% chance of sharing a trait. In this case we can safely say that genetics has an influence on this trait.
It is not length of life, but depth of life. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
- BGoodForGoodSake
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:44 am
- Christian: No
- Location: Washington D.C.
Traits in general.Gman wrote:What trait are you refering too? Traits in general or the homosexual trait?In this case we can safely say that genetics has an influence on this trait.
For instance lets say we did a study on food preferences. Lets say we have four groups. Twins who grew up together(Group A), twins separated at birth(Group B), non-twin siblings(Group C), and perfect strangers(Group D).
Lets say we have 100 pairs in each group.
We poll each individual for which kinds of foods they prefer the most. They have a choice between sweet, and salty.
The results come back as follows.
Group A
49% chose the same choice
Group B
51% chose the same choice
Group C
28% chose the same choice
Group D
22% chose the same choice
We can see that genetics does indeed seem to be a factor in food preference.
It is not length of life, but depth of life. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
homosexuals
If homosexuality is genetic and the person has no choice at all in the matter then both twins from one egg will be homosexual or heterosexual, the same way both twins from one egg must be either male or female. This does not happen so there is a choice involved in homosexuality.
Ray
Ray
Re: homosexuals
That's one way of looking at what BGood was saying. Another way would be that genetics do play a role in homosexuality but it's not the only role. It's a combination of both genetic and environmental factors. I could be wrong but I believe that's what he was driving at.ray wrote:If homosexuality is genetic and the person has no choice at all in the matter then both twins from one egg will be homosexual or heterosexual, the same way both twins from one egg must be either male or female. This does not happen so there is a choice involved in homosexuality.
Ray
- Canuckster1127
- Old School
- Posts: 5310
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:31 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
Re: homosexuals
That's my view. I believe that there are genetic factors that may incline someone in that direction more than others. However, it's not an absolute and there are factors of environment and choice that play into it as well.Byblos wrote:That's one way of looking at what BGood was saying. Another way would be that genetics do play a role in homosexuality but it's not the only role. It's a combination of both genetic and environmental factors. I could be wrong but I believe that's what he was driving at.ray wrote:If homosexuality is genetic and the person has no choice at all in the matter then both twins from one egg will be homosexual or heterosexual, the same way both twins from one egg must be either male or female. This does not happen so there is a choice involved in homosexuality.
Ray
Dogmatism is the comfortable intellectual framework of self-righteousness. Self-righteousness is more decadent than the worst sexual sin. ~ Dan Allender
-
- Prestigious Senior Member
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 7:11 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Young-Earth Creationist
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Re: homosexuals
And on top of all that there is the sin factor. We are all born with all the seeds of every sin in us. Maybe some are more "genetically" presupposed to certain sins than others, but there isn't one of us who couldn't fall into any of them.Canuckster1127 wrote:That's my view. I believe that there are genetic factors that may incline someone in that direction more than others. However, it's not an absolute and there are factors of environment and choice that play into it as well.Byblos wrote:That's one way of looking at what BGood was saying. Another way would be that genetics do play a role in homosexuality but it's not the only role. It's a combination of both genetic and environmental factors. I could be wrong but I believe that's what he was driving at.ray wrote:If homosexuality is genetic and the person has no choice at all in the matter then both twins from one egg will be homosexual or heterosexual, the same way both twins from one egg must be either male or female. This does not happen so there is a choice involved in homosexuality.
Ray
Romans 7
24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.