I will do the same for opinions and assertions, but in Red.
Then we can determine if the facts back up the assertions.
Here are the facts related to this argumentGman wrote:KARYOTYPES,OF COURSE,ARE THE ENGINES OF INHERITANCE.
-evolution's unbelievable phylogenies are so obviously incompatible with karyotypes(perhaps because Darwin knew nothing about inheritance-he published his fantasies 7 years before Gregor Mendel's original publication,decades before Mendel's findings were widely known).Evolution's fantasies have never caught up with and can never catch up with or accomodate the facts of biology(read on,please);karyotypes conclusively disprove evolution's implausible phylogenies.
-meiosis absolutely/obviously thwarts evolution(by thwarting the generation of novel-and-fertile karyotypes)
-evolution cannot account for karyotypes,nor,therefore,for the origin of species.
-karyotypes and their modes of function prove that they could not have originated by incremental growth.
Evolution's fantasies rest on false premiss,evade contradictory evidence,are incompatible with karyotypes,meiosis,the environment,and more.
Evolution rests on the absurd assumption that errors in nucleic acid replication could produce novel karyotypes-obviously entirely irrational.
Evolution cannot incorporate karyotypes nor the mechanisms of meiosis since they are entirely incompatible with it.Meiosis thwarts reproducible modification of chromosome number.
Ironically,and for exactly the same reasons as above evolution provides no explanation for any fossil ever found!!!And conversely,fossils are no evidence of evolution!!!
Evolution has no modus operandi,since gene mutations cannot produce novel chromosomes or karyotypes.And novel karyotypes cannot breed.Has evolution not seen these most obvious errors?
Dear Reader,I suspect that the few facts discussed here represent merely the starting point of an exciting journey of discovering the grossness of the errors of evolution. Evolution is a very elaborate fallacy which is very simply disproven.EVOLUTION IS ENTIRELY IMPRACTICABLE AND UNFEASIBLE-ABSURD.Many many facts trash evolution.The discussion below centres on sexual reproduction.Evolution could never ever have produced a cell,let alone progress beyond asexual reproduction. Polyploidy could never have produced karyotypes as we know them,for two reasons at least.Firstly,polyploidy never produces novel chromosomes. Secondly,simple arithmetic tells us that polyploidy could never have produced karyotypes as we know them.And besides,polyploidy is only relevant to plants.Karyotypes ridicule evolution and laugh it to scorn. Evolution cannot breed.
Each chromosome has one centromere.a split chromosome will lose that part which is no longer attached to the centromere- the detached part will not be included in next cell division.the part still attached to the centromere will probably not be able to synapse so as to enable the next meiotic division.
If a centromere splits transversely all the genes of one of the segments of the chromosome will be lost.splitting chromosomes cannot beget evolution. Centromeres outsmart evolution.
Meiosis thwarts reproducible modification of chromosome number. gene mutations cannot produce novel chromosomes or karyotypes polyploidy never produces novel chromosomes Each chromosome has one centromere a split chromosome will lose that part which is no longer attached to the centromere- the detached part will not be included in next cell division.And now the conclusions.
evolution's unbelievable phylogenies are so obviously incompatible with karyotypes meiosis absolutely/obviously thwarts evolution evolution cannot account for karyotypes Evolution cannot incorporate karyotypes nor the mechanisms of meiosis since they are entirely incompatible with it. Polyploidy could never have produced karyotypes as we know them simple arithmetic tells us that polyploidy could never have produced karyotypes as we know them polyploidy is only relevant to plants Centromeres outsmart evolutionNow we can stay on this portion of the email and discuss if you choose, or we can do this with the entire email first.
