number of the beast?
-
- Familiar Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:32 pm
- Christian: No
number of the beast?
Is it 666 or 616?
- jenna
- Make me a Sammich Member
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:36 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Female
- Creation Position: Gap Theory
Re: number of the beast?
I believe the bible says 666. I am not sure where 616 comes from.
some things are better left unsaid, which i generally realize after i have said them
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:47 pm
- Christian: No
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: number of the beast?
Now, I may be WAY off on this, but i heard that in Revelations, the number 3 represents God and the number 6 represents man. So the significance of three 6's is that the Beast will try to convince mankind that they can become God. That's why it is 666.
I am committed to belief in God, as the most morally demanding, psychologically enriching, intellectually satisfying and imaginatively fruitful hypothesis about the ultimate nature of reality known to me - Keith Ward
-
- Familiar Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:32 pm
- Christian: No
Re: number of the beast?
Well a fragment of papyrus has been found suggesting that the real number of the beast is 616
http://www.csad.ox.ac.uk/POxy/beast616.htm
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=44169
http://www.religionnewsblog.com/11134/b ... ued-to-616
http://www.csad.ox.ac.uk/POxy/beast616.htm
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=44169
http://www.religionnewsblog.com/11134/b ... ued-to-616
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:47 pm
- Christian: No
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: number of the beast?
either way, it doesnt matter too much...
its 666 though
its 666 though
I am committed to belief in God, as the most morally demanding, psychologically enriching, intellectually satisfying and imaginatively fruitful hypothesis about the ultimate nature of reality known to me - Keith Ward
-
- Familiar Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:32 pm
- Christian: No
Re: number of the beast?
well the thing is that if it WAS 616, that would make the bible wrong right?
- jenna
- Make me a Sammich Member
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:36 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Female
- Creation Position: Gap Theory
Re: number of the beast?
Yes, it would. But who are we supposed to believe, the word of man or the word of God? Is the bible wrong?Markster106 wrote:well the thing is that if it WAS 616, that would make the bible wrong right?
some things are better left unsaid, which i generally realize after i have said them
-
- Familiar Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:32 pm
- Christian: No
Re: number of the beast?
but the bible is the word of god, so it must be perfect right?
- jenna
- Make me a Sammich Member
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:36 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Female
- Creation Position: Gap Theory
Re: number of the beast?
Exactly.Markster106 wrote:but the bible is the word of god, so it must be perfect right?
some things are better left unsaid, which i generally realize after i have said them
-
- Familiar Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:32 pm
- Christian: No
Re: number of the beast?
so if the real number was 616, the bible would be wrong and therefore god would be wrong right?
- jenna
- Make me a Sammich Member
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:36 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Female
- Creation Position: Gap Theory
Re: number of the beast?
Yes, that would be true. And since God is never wrong, then the number is 666. Anything else would make God a liar and deceiver. Is this how you view it?Markster106 wrote:so if the real number was 616, the bible would be wrong and therefore god would be wrong right?
some things are better left unsaid, which i generally realize after i have said them
-
- Familiar Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:32 pm
- Christian: No
Re: number of the beast?
Well then why is there papyrus that says the number is 616?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:47 pm
- Christian: No
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: number of the beast?
The Bible is the source of the so-called "number of the beast". So how in the world can the Bible say 666 and the "actual" number be 616? That is like saying "do Romeo and Juliet die at the end of Shakespeare's tradgedy "Romeo and Juliet"? Shakespeare's script says they do, but so-and-so says they don't. Therefore Shakespeare was WRONG!!!!"
Even if it did turn out that the real number is 616, that would only mean there was an error in translation along the way. It would NOT make the BIBLE wrong. The english TRANSLATION of the Bible can be wrong about something, as it has been about many things before. However, the Bible itself, translation errors aside, is a solid piece of work.
Besides just cause some person on the web says its 616 doesn't mean it actually is. There are people on the web that claim that the earth is flat...
Even if it did turn out that the real number is 616, that would only mean there was an error in translation along the way. It would NOT make the BIBLE wrong. The english TRANSLATION of the Bible can be wrong about something, as it has been about many things before. However, the Bible itself, translation errors aside, is a solid piece of work.
Besides just cause some person on the web says its 616 doesn't mean it actually is. There are people on the web that claim that the earth is flat...
Last edited by Seraph on Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am committed to belief in God, as the most morally demanding, psychologically enriching, intellectually satisfying and imaginatively fruitful hypothesis about the ultimate nature of reality known to me - Keith Ward
-
- Familiar Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:32 pm
- Christian: No
Re: number of the beast?
Translation errors? So god allowed his "perfect" word to be corrupted? How are we even sure that the "originals" are perfect if they can be corrupted by human error?Seraph wrote:The Bible is the source of the so-called "number of the beast". So how in the world can the Bible say 666 and the "actual" number be 616? That is like saying "do Romeo and Juliet die at the end of Shakespeare's tradgedy "Romeo and Juliet"? The script says they do, but so-and-so says they don't. Therefore Shakespeare was WRONG!!!!"
Even if it did turn out that the real number is 616, that would only mean there was an error in translation along the way. It would NOT make the BIBLE wrong. The english TRANSLATION of the Bible can be wrong about something, as it has been about many things before. However, the Bible itself, translation errors aside, is a solid piece of work.
Besides just cause some person on the web says its 616 doesn't mean it actually is. There are people on the web that claim that the earth is flat...
Wow, it's not just some random person claiming it to be 616. It says it right there on the papyrus.
http://www.csad.ox.ac.uk/POxy/beast616.htm
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:47 pm
- Christian: No
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: number of the beast?
Translation errors have always been very minor and don't impact the message of the bible. So yes I'd say God has been successful in making sure his perfect word spread around the globe, despite small errors on man's, not God's part.
Also yay, I'm a recognized member now
Also yay, I'm a recognized member now
I am committed to belief in God, as the most morally demanding, psychologically enriching, intellectually satisfying and imaginatively fruitful hypothesis about the ultimate nature of reality known to me - Keith Ward