Like many other Christians, I have found myself drawn to the field of apologetics after staring doubt in the face and, in the end, strengthening my faith. I know that there are several common approaches to apologetics. What are your favorites/preferences?
Personally, I like appealing directly to the resurrection and post-resurrection appearances, and I like the minimal facts method as espoused by Gary Habermas.
Apologetics fields
-
rodyshusband
- Established Member
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:23 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: Upstate New York, USA
Re: Apologetics fields
Gary Habermas is excellent.
I am most comfortable approaching the moral issue.
I prefer to ask questions and allow the skeptic to reveal a contradictory worldview. The illogic shows through and stimulates thought.
I like the early works of Francis Schaeffer and the teachings of Ravi Zacharias.
I am most comfortable approaching the moral issue.
I prefer to ask questions and allow the skeptic to reveal a contradictory worldview. The illogic shows through and stimulates thought.
I like the early works of Francis Schaeffer and the teachings of Ravi Zacharias.
“Christianity provides a unified answer for the whole of life.” -- Francis Schaeffer