Exactly!! Gman
MOst textbooks wax poetic about th structure of water being the key part of the ability of orgamisms to survive.
The point to its polarity, its angle, its density at freezing, its high heat of vaporization, and it high specific heat. And they point to the structure of the water taht leads to its ability to do all of these things.
God and Science don't mix, so don't try.
- zoegirl
- Old School
- Posts: 3927
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:59 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Female
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: east coast
Re: God and Science don't mix, so don't try.
"And we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Jesus Christ"
-
- Familiar Member
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:30 am
- Christian: No
- Sex: Male
Re: God and Science don't mix, so don't try.
Of course. We know that the properties of water and specific atmospheric conditions are what give rise to the properties of an individual snowflake. But now imagine that you had no knowledge of these facts, and you were looking at a snowflake for the first time. Would you conclude that it was designed, or the result of natural processes?Gman wrote:Or perhaps did the existing properties of the water molecule minus heat produce the snowflake?
My point is that it is not always trivial to determine what is designed and what is not. Merely observing an object's structure is often insufficient. More evidence is needed.
- zoegirl
- Old School
- Posts: 3927
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:59 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Female
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: east coast
Re: God and Science don't mix, so don't try.
Okay, point taken, but sometimes it is easy
"And we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Jesus Christ"
- Gman
- Old School
- Posts: 6081
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 10:36 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: Northern California
Re: God and Science don't mix, so don't try.
I would conclude it was designed by a creator...hopefulcynic wrote:Of course. We know that the properties of water and specific atmospheric conditions are what give rise to the properties of an individual snowflake. But now imagine that you had no knowledge of these facts, and you were looking at a snowflake for the first time. Would you conclude that it was designed, or the result of natural processes?
And it appears the more evidence we dig up the more we find that chance cannot create anything let alone a casino.. No pun intended.hopefulcynic wrote:My point is that it is not always trivial to determine what is designed and what is not. Merely observing an object's structure is often insufficient. More evidence is needed.
The heart cannot rejoice in what the mind rejects as false - Galileo
We learn from history that we do not learn from history - Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel
Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable, if anything is excellent or praiseworthy, think about such things. -Philippians 4:8
We learn from history that we do not learn from history - Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel
Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable, if anything is excellent or praiseworthy, think about such things. -Philippians 4:8