http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1 ... vered.html
This web link suggests that scientists need to re look at the current theory or whatever and claim that it is only a hiccup for Evolution. What can anyone tell me me in response.
Thanks
Fish-Tetrapod Transition
-
jlay
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 3613
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:47 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Young-Earth Creationist
Re: Fish-Tetrapod Transition
I never understood the reasoning.
Wouldn't the first reasonable assumption be to reconsider how old they believe the mud to be?
Wouldn't the first reasonable assumption be to reconsider how old they believe the mud to be?
-“The Bible treated allegorically becomes putty in the hands of the exegete.” John Walvoord
"I'm not saying scientists don't overstate their results. They do. And it's understandable, too...If you spend years working toward a certain goal and make no progress, of course you are going to spin your results in a positive light." Ivellious
"I'm not saying scientists don't overstate their results. They do. And it's understandable, too...If you spend years working toward a certain goal and make no progress, of course you are going to spin your results in a positive light." Ivellious
-
zoegirl
- Old School
- Posts: 3927
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:59 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Female
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: east coast
Re: Fish-Tetrapod Transition
they don't say, but I wouldn't doubt that they have done so. It's a very uninformative news piece, it doesn't provide many details.
"And we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Jesus Christ"