I read your later post in which you convinced me that you understood the concept of spiritual birth/regeneration/born again/new nature, et al. Of course, as a non-believer, the very idea of «saving faith» is bunk to you. Notice that I said «as a non-believer.» I worded this carefully so as to include agnostics and theists of all stripes, as well as atheists. Indeed, all of you share in the same disbelief of Jesus' atonement and the regeneration of the «heart» by the Spirit. (That is, the changing of one's disposition from one of enmity towards God to one of willingness to please God.) So, how would you explain Paul's remarkable conversion on his trip to Damascus? How did he go from being an unbeliever like you to a believer in just a few days?hatsoff wrote:
I don't think anyone has a "saving faith." A corollary to the non-existence of God is that Jesus was never sent by God to atone for man's sin. What I lost is a sincere and openly-professed belief that the Trinitarian God exists.
Again, I think you are confusing religion with faith. At best, you had a false faith in works and the assorted mumbo-jumbo of your religion. For what it's worth, I would not view an unbeliever taking communion as an act of disrespect. I'm sure many unbelievers commune every week in churches around the world. As someone once told me, «you have to start somewhere.» For some, that first step may be partaking in rituals, others may read the Bible looking for contradictions, others may...debate Christians on internet forums. You have to start somewhere. It's all good as long as your disposition is one of learning.The only Christian ritual in which I took part was Holy Communion, and yes, I stopped doing that once I lost my faith. Christians would view an unbeliever's presence at the Lord's table an act of disrespect, and understandably so.
FL