Fürstentum Liechtenstein wrote:
I understand that you want to believe that. Unfortunately, this will never happen as per your requirements, so you are safe in your unbelief. I would also add that when this did happen, most refused to believe. You are, therefore, in very numerous company.
Of course you are making assumptions about me when you don't know me. My requirements are just fine. I'm sorry if I want to see tangible evidence that God exists. I mean, how could I be so stupid as to want that?
FL wrote:
You are free to continue in your current condition and to blame your unbelief (and all the world's ills) on God if you wish. Again, you are in very numerous company.
In any event, you would never worship anyway because you hate God, and hate the idea of God.
Here you are making stupid assumptions when you don't know me. You remind me of scientologists. To be quite honest.
Actually I do not hate God. Because I can't really hate what I do not believe in. As for the idea of a God, I don't hate that either.
FL wrote:
God, who gives you the liberty to believe whatever you want and to live your life however you want while advising you of the consequences doesn't deserve to be worshiped? Not very intelligent on your part...but if it works for you, who am I to question?
Ah, but this isn't the God you described. You described a God that if he deems you needed he will let you have faith in him. The others can just burn. Regardless, There is no reason to believe in said consequences.
FL wrote:
Here, you are correct. I am describing the God of the Bible. You don't know him - obviously - so stick around if you're willing to find out about him.
Oh, I've read his hit book. I've listened to his followers. Never a compelling argument out of either. I'm willing to listen and concede. Only when the evidence is in your favor.
Of course, you have this pre determined thought of me when you do not know me. You know, help me out with this one...Who said "Judge not lest you be judged" The name is at the tip of my tongue...But I can't remember. I think it was some fellow important to some religion. You know a really central part of it. Who is the one that said that again?
BTW...why are you here?
Because I want to be here and have discussion.