Son of Man

Are you a sincere seeker who has questions about Christianity, or a Christian with doubts about your faith? Post them here to receive a thoughtful response.
Post Reply
CeT-To
Senior Member
Posts: 735
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:57 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Undecided

Son of Man

Post by CeT-To »

What does the Son of Man mean?

CeT-To
But joy and happiness in you to all who seek you! Let them ceaselessly cry,"Great is Yahweh" who love your saving power. Psalm 40:16

I Praise you Yahweh, my Lord, my God!!!!!
User avatar
Canuckster1127
Old School
Posts: 5310
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:31 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada

Re: Son of Man

Post by Canuckster1127 »

It's a semetic idiom that in general refers to humanity and the future state of humanity.

More specifically, it's a phrase that Jesus applied to Himself, which most Hebrews hearing would recognize as a title that claimed a special standing before God as representative of all mankind. The use of the title implied the role of Messiah and representative of man before God. The use of the term in general appears several times in the Old Testament. It appears many times in the NT. Depending on the context it can be seen as a reminder of Jesus' status of not only God but also fully Human as is spelled out more clearly in Phil 2:5-11.

There's all kinds of reference on the internet that a discerning reader can filter through and learn more about the term and how it is used more specifically, especially in several parables of Christ where he uses the term.
Dogmatism is the comfortable intellectual framework of self-righteousness. Self-righteousness is more decadent than the worst sexual sin. ~ Dan Allender
User avatar
truthman
Established Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:39 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Young-Earth Creationist
Location: Fort Defiance, Arizona

Re: Son of Man

Post by truthman »

ditto to what my southern wandering Canuck friend has said.
Also, keep in mind that God said, "let us make man in our image..." and then created Adam.
Adam, the perfect sinless man created in the image of God had no children. Adam and Eve only had children after they had sinned and experienced separation from God (death). Jesus being born of a virgin without the sin nature was truly the only man ever born in the image of the first man. He was the Son of Man.
Jesus was then called the last Adam in the sense that He replaced Adam. 1 Corinthians 15:45
Last edited by truthman on Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. " 1 Corinthians 13:1-2
User avatar
RickD
Make me a Sammich Member
Posts: 22063
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:59 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Day-Age
Location: Kitchen

Re: Son of Man

Post by RickD »

Canuckster1127 wrote:It's a semetic idiom that in general refers to humanity and the future state of humanity.

More specifically, it's a phrase that Jesus applied to Himself, which most Hebrews hearing would recognize as a title that claimed a special standing before God as representative of all mankind. The use of the title implied the role of Messiah and representative of man before God. The use of the term in general appears several times in the Old Testament. It appears many times in the NT. Depending on the context it can be seen as a reminder of Jesus' status of not only God but also fully Human as is spelled out more clearly in Phil 2:5-11.

There's all kinds of reference on the internet that a discerning reader can filter through and learn more about the term and how it is used more specifically, especially in several parables of Christ where he uses the term.
I was just going to say that it tells about the human side of Him. But, Bart explained it a lot better.
John 5:24
24 “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.


“A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.”
-Edward R Murrow




St. Richard the Sarcastic--The Patron Saint of Irony
CeT-To
Senior Member
Posts: 735
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:57 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Undecided

Re: Son of Man

Post by CeT-To »

thanx guys but i forgot why Jesus had to be born of a virgin, couldnt the sin nature also come from Mary? Or Jesus got his Man "genes" from her ?
But joy and happiness in you to all who seek you! Let them ceaselessly cry,"Great is Yahweh" who love your saving power. Psalm 40:16

I Praise you Yahweh, my Lord, my God!!!!!
User avatar
Canuckster1127
Old School
Posts: 5310
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:31 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada

Re: Son of Man

Post by Canuckster1127 »

CeT-To wrote:thanx guys but i forgot why Jesus had to be born of a virgin, couldnt the sin nature also come from Mary? Or Jesus got his Man "genes" from her ?
There's different points of view. Some traditions, particularly the Catholic Church hold that Mary herself was immaculately conceived so that she didn't have a sin nature to pass on.

I don't see that as necessary. Jesus' lack of a sin nature and being fully human can be attributed to his own full deity or it can simply be attributed to the will of God the Father. The Bible really doesn't say with a high level of specificity. The explanations in this arena, in my opinion, are more designed to answer questions that a particular vein of philosophy and thinking ask, natural theology which is a decidedly greek tradition. The Bible as a whole, doesn't come from that point of view. So the answers that are often put together on these types of questions are answering questions that the Bible may never have been intended to answer.

Does that help at all?
Dogmatism is the comfortable intellectual framework of self-righteousness. Self-righteousness is more decadent than the worst sexual sin. ~ Dan Allender
cslewislover
Ultimate Member
Posts: 2333
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:09 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Female
Creation Position: Undecided
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Son of Man

Post by cslewislover »

Canuckster1127 wrote:
There's different points of view. Some traditions, particularly the Catholic Church hold that Mary herself was immaculately conceived so that she didn't have a sin nature to pass on.
y:-/ I'm not saying this to argue at all, but if Mary was immaculately conceived, then wouldn't her mom had to have been the same, all the way back through time . . . but then, there could be no sinless beginning. If some process made Mary immaculately conceived only, then that same process would've been conceivable for Jesus to begin with. :econfused:

Anyway, lol, if I find anything to elaborate more on the Son of Man title, I'll add it.
Image
"I believe in Christianity as I believe the sun has risen, not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else." C.S. Lewis
User avatar
truthman
Established Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:39 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Young-Earth Creationist
Location: Fort Defiance, Arizona

Re: Son of Man

Post by truthman »

CSLL
You are correct regarding the immaculate conception of Mary. Her mother, and her mother, etc. would have also had to have had immaculate conception. Plus, there is no Scripture to support the immaculate conception of Mary.

The reason that Jesus HAD to be born of a virgin was because God had to be the father. The person (personality made up of mind, heart, and will) and Spirit was the eternal God the Son. When the Holy Spirit of God acted in the womb of Mary, He united the eternal Son of God with a human egg from Mary which was then born as Jesus. If Jesus would have had an earthly father, then He couldn't have been God the Son.
Also, if He had had a human father, he would have inherited Adam's sin nature, and been a sinner like the rest of us.
"Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. " 1 Corinthians 13:1-2
User avatar
One of Many
Acquainted Member
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:00 pm
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Undecided
Location: Northwest Arkansas

Re: Son of Man

Post by One of Many »

CeT-To wrote:thanx guys but i forgot why Jesus had to be born of a virgin, couldnt the sin nature also come from Mary? Or Jesus got his Man "genes" from her ?
The sin nature of man is said to be passed down from Adam ( the Adamic seed ), so to be born of a virgin would be to come from a womb that never new the seed of man.
No academic back up for this, just my thought on the subject.
User avatar
Canuckster1127
Old School
Posts: 5310
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:31 am
Christian: Yes
Sex: Male
Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada

Re: Son of Man

Post by Canuckster1127 »

One of Many wrote:
CeT-To wrote:thanx guys but i forgot why Jesus had to be born of a virgin, couldnt the sin nature also come from Mary? Or Jesus got his Man "genes" from her ?
The sin nature of man is said to be passed down from Adam ( the Adamic seed ), so to be born of a virgin would be to come from a womb that never new the seed of man.
No academic back up for this, just my thought on the subject.
There is no biblical back up for it. It's inferred by those who have constructed a framework that needs to explain why something is the way it is. I'm not saying it is wrong necessarily. However, the assumptions are found in the framework, not necessarily the Bible itself.
Dogmatism is the comfortable intellectual framework of self-righteousness. Self-righteousness is more decadent than the worst sexual sin. ~ Dan Allender
Post Reply