"No 'Creator' Needed for Life to Appear in the Universe"

[Proinsias]

but the work does solve some long-standing, mostly-philosophical debates about the origin and spread of life.

I don't think it does

[Byblos]

With all due respect you have no clue what you're talking about. This very website was founded on the premise that there is complete harmony between the Genesis account and science. Please read some of the articles on the main page.

But that is an extremely minority position. Most people, including most Christians, who read Genesis, see a conflict with science.

Not true at all. The Catholic Church has no official position on evolution and its 1.1 billion followers are free to take any position they wish vis a vis evolution. And the majority do not see a conflict between God and science.

This would suggest that even if it is not correct, his position is a reasonable one.

Depends on one's perspective, doesn't it?

Also, are you suggesting that evolution is not science?

Where did I even hint at anything remotely suggesting that? (besides, it depends on what type of evolution you're referring to ).