I came across this recently and thought it was a helpful listing of logical fallicies. It may be of help to those who want to better understand what a person means when they identify (or claim to identify) a fallacy in somebody's argument, like a straw man or a false dilemma. Or maybe in reading something there's something that just doesn't seem right but you can't put your finger on it. Checking here might help you clarify what you think is happening and express it in a way that is a little clearer for all involved.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/
Index of Common Logical Fallicies
- Canuckster1127
- Old School
- Posts: 5310
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:31 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
Index of Common Logical Fallicies
Dogmatism is the comfortable intellectual framework of self-righteousness. Self-righteousness is more decadent than the worst sexual sin. ~ Dan Allender
- puritan lad
- Esteemed Senior Member
- Posts: 1491
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:44 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Undecided
- Location: Stuarts Draft, VA
- Contact:
Re: Index of Common Logical Fallicies
Good site.
One word on Begging the Question (Circular Arguments). Not all circular arguments are logical fallacies, because all arguments are circular at the metaphysical level, Broadly circular arguments are fallacies in that they assume a position on what's being debated. Narrowly circular arguments, however, are not fallacies, but rather provide a foundation for arguing anything. (ie. "I think, therefore I am" is a narrowly circular argument).
In addition, an argument can be a fallacy and still be true, like the Bible argument given on the site.
One word on Begging the Question (Circular Arguments). Not all circular arguments are logical fallacies, because all arguments are circular at the metaphysical level, Broadly circular arguments are fallacies in that they assume a position on what's being debated. Narrowly circular arguments, however, are not fallacies, but rather provide a foundation for arguing anything. (ie. "I think, therefore I am" is a narrowly circular argument).
In addition, an argument can be a fallacy and still be true, like the Bible argument given on the site.
"To suppose that whatever God requireth of us that we have power of ourselves to do, is to make the cross and grace of Jesus Christ of none effect." - JOHN OWEN
//covenant-theology.blogspot.com
//christianskepticism.blogspot.com/
//covenant-theology.blogspot.com
//christianskepticism.blogspot.com/
- Canuckster1127
- Old School
- Posts: 5310
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:31 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
Re: Index of Common Logical Fallicies
I agree PL. Logic in the end is structure and there are two measures that ultimately must be applied to any assertion in the form of logic.
1. The internal Validity: Meaning that there are no fallacies or disconnects such as you note. It's possible for a logical assertion to be true even though the argument put forward is internally inconsistent. The most you can say in that situation is that the argument itself is invalid. The truth of the premises of the assertion may or may not be true.
2. The truth of premises themselves. An argument can be perfectly valid internally yet it can be no more true than the assertions that it rests upon.
1. The internal Validity: Meaning that there are no fallacies or disconnects such as you note. It's possible for a logical assertion to be true even though the argument put forward is internally inconsistent. The most you can say in that situation is that the argument itself is invalid. The truth of the premises of the assertion may or may not be true.
2. The truth of premises themselves. An argument can be perfectly valid internally yet it can be no more true than the assertions that it rests upon.
Dogmatism is the comfortable intellectual framework of self-righteousness. Self-righteousness is more decadent than the worst sexual sin. ~ Dan Allender
- SnowDrops
- Established Member
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:16 pm
- Christian: No
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Undecided
Re: Index of Common Logical Fallicies
It's going to take a while to read all of that. Would be nice to know the terminology though, because right now when someone says "strawman" I have no idea what they're talking about.
The first step to learning is to admit that you don't know.
- SnowDrops
- Established Member
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:16 pm
- Christian: No
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Undecided
Re: Index of Common Logical Fallicies
I suppose logical fallacies must make for bad cooking.You like eggs, icecream, pizza, cake, fish, jello, chicken, taco sauce, soda, oranges, milk, egg rolls, and yogurt so you must like this yummy dish made out of all of them.
The first step to learning is to admit that you don't know.