"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." (Psalm 19:1)
https://discussions.godandscience.org/
I can boil water that has ice cubes in it.PaulSacramento wrote:Are you suggesting that water boils at another temperature?I invite you to try boiling water at 100C. Let us know if you succeed.
How do you know?
Do you have any proof?
Frogs are better... start off with cold water and bring it slowly to boil.Audie wrote:I can boil water that has ice cubes in it.PaulSacramento wrote:Are you suggesting that water boils at another temperature?I invite you to try boiling water at 100C. Let us know if you succeed.
How do you know?
Do you have any proof?
We did this experiment at school, quite a cool experiment. But this doesn't change the fact that water will always boil at 100 deg C, can we change the parameters and lower the boiling point of water, yes we can, but this doesn't change the fact that water once it reaches 100 deg C will always boil.Audie wrote:I can boil water that has ice cubes in it.PaulSacramento wrote:Are you suggesting that water boils at another temperature?I invite you to try boiling water at 100C. Let us know if you succeed.
How do you know?
Do you have any proof?
But we can change the parameters to change the 'fact' that once it reaches 100ºC it will always boil, we can boil water at a lower atmospheric pressure than sea level, making tea in the Netherlands would suffice without taking into account the rest of the known universe.Danieltwotwenty wrote:We did this experiment at school, quite a cool experiment. But this doesn't change the fact that water will always boil at 100 deg C, can we change the parameters and lower the boiling point of water, yes we can, but this doesn't change the fact that water once it reaches 100 deg C will always boil.
Yes I understand what your saying Pro but water will always boil at a specific temp depending on conditions, I think that is the point Paul was making. It will always boil at a certain point according to the given parameters, if the parameters change then it will always boil at whatever that temperature according to the parametersis. It remains a constant and consistent fact no matter what, well at least I think it does.Proinsias wrote:But we can change the parameters to change the 'fact' that once it reaches 100ºC it will always boil, we can boil water at a lower atmospheric pressure than sea level, making tea in the Netherlands would suffice without taking into account the rest of the known universe.Danieltwotwenty wrote:We did this experiment at school, quite a cool experiment. But this doesn't change the fact that water will always boil at 100 deg C, can we change the parameters and lower the boiling point of water, yes we can, but this doesn't change the fact that water once it reaches 100 deg C will always boil.
I can also show you water at 150C that is not boiling.Danieltwotwenty wrote:We did this experiment at school, quite a cool experiment. But this doesn't change the fact that water will always boil at 100 deg C, can we change the parameters and lower the boiling point of water, yes we can, but this doesn't change the fact that water once it reaches 100 deg C will always boil.Audie wrote:I can boil water that has ice cubes in it.PaulSacramento wrote:Are you suggesting that water boils at another temperature?I invite you to try boiling water at 100C. Let us know if you succeed.
How do you know?
Do you have any proof?
Where is the missing link?Audie wrote: The theory of evolution has also been proved beyond reasonable doubt.
I think that latter observation should bring something out. Lets see.
Seriously? I was hoping for something a little more thoughtful.B. W. wrote:Where is the missing link?Audie wrote: The theory of evolution has also been proved beyond reasonable doubt.
I think that latter observation should bring something out. Lets see.
-
-
-
Perhaps. You have some data to share?melanie wrote:And under precise reasonable doubt???
Evolution has been proved.
Under the same premise of reasonable doubt perhaps proves God also
Sheesh, I must have a tell.B. W. wrote:So Audie. do you attend Berkeley?
If so, that explains a lot!
-
-
-
That's why its best to start religious indoctrination while children are very young.Kurieuo wrote:Frogs are better... start off with cold water and bring it slowly to boil.Audie wrote:I can boil water that has ice cubes in it.PaulSacramento wrote:Are you suggesting that water boils at another temperature?I invite you to try boiling water at 100C. Let us know if you succeed.
How do you know?
Do you have any proof?
Some parts of the bible are pretty wild fiction, some is dreary as ditch water, there is nice poetry, and a bit of history. Its quite a mixture, no so easily made into a simple either / or.Philip wrote:This is aimed at no one in particular: But it always amazes me the wide range of complex things - or ANYthing - that people think can come into existence without a cause. As common sense tells you that somewhere, somehow, EVERY thing sprang from some prior thing and process. So whatever came first, HAD to exist forever, uncaused, and and possesses astounding intelligence, power and ability. At the end of the day, once this is realized, you have only TWO choices of how to respond to this: You can either deny it - and thus abandon basic reason itself - OR you can just refuse to deal with it and attempt to convince yourself that the questions surrounding our origins are likely a) forever unknowable and b) likely irrelevant - and that if you never sincerely seek their answers, it really doesn't matter. Either way would be just fine - IF the Bible is just another book of wildly inventive fiction. But if it's not...
What indoctrinate people with truth?Audie wrote:That's why its best to start religious indoctrination while children are very young.Kurieuo wrote:Frogs are better... start off with cold water and bring it slowly to boil.Audie wrote:I can boil water that has ice cubes in it.PaulSacramento wrote:Are you suggesting that water boils at another temperature?I invite you to try boiling water at 100C. Let us know if you succeed.
How do you know?
Do you have any proof?
Why not teach kids how to think?Danieltwotwenty wrote:
What indoctrinate people with truth?
